Bob Jim

Firstly, AMD cannot just shrink fiji. You evidently have no understanding of the very basics of this technology; a 14nm fiji would be expensive to produce and quite frankly stupid, as a new design that was made for 14nm is likely to be more efficient/powerful. Secondly, AMD has enough money to create a whole new lineup; it'll stretch them, but they will be able to. Anyways, if they don't they will see profits fall most likely.

Mountain Dew would have improved it. /s Just test it out a bunch before using it in a game. It is really up to chance with small spills like that as to whether it will survive.

OEM cards that you could not even buy as a separate component. I was referring to GPUs that people can buy, and hence actually care about.

Every single time AMD has had a process node shrink every card in the next generation has been new. Every. Single. Time. What is so hard to accept about that?

-No PSU cover/basement for easy cable management -A fairly standard HDD mounting system, none of the hidden discreet stuff featured in some more modern cases - HDD mounts at front restrict airflow a bit and prevent taller rads from being installed without sacrificing on hdd numbers.

Good choices include: -NZXT H440 - Simplistic design, space efficient, PSU basement, has space for showing off SSDs. -NZXT N450 - Same as above but futuristic design and an in-built fan hub -Fractal Design R5 - Quiet, simple in design and less shouty than the above -Corsair 450D - Slightly lacking in soem newer features, but has a very elegant design -Corsair 600C - Simple, inverted motherboard look, massive window, PSU basement.

A computer is a tool/toy. Do you name your hammers and toy cars as well? 'I'm gonna call you bob, and you can be fred. Yay!'

Also sorry to get the thread off topic but how does that cpu handle the 980ti? Just wondering if I should bother OCing my 6500 (I have a 380)

Wish I had the money to buy random mice to try, i would immediately try the g502, currently have the sabre optical rgb.

I would love 4 of these magnetic strips. I have a Corsair 250D, which is steel, so no need for adhesive ones. I have currently no lighting, and my PC sits on my desk right next to me; I would love to be able to have a little bit of under glow at the bottom of my PC, as well as lighting up the internals. Currently I have no lighting, although at some point I will be getting a kraken x31. This is my current build (the Z170 mobo was to overclock, but Intel has really screwed me over with that, haven't they?): PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant CPU: Intel Core i5-6500 3.2GHz Quad-Core Processor (£151.28) Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170N-WIFI Mini ITX LGA1151 Motherboard (£103.99) Memory: Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR4-2400 Memory (£41.29) Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive (£34.99) Video Card: Sapphire Radeon R9 380 4GB Nitro Video Card (£149.99) Case: Corsair 250D Mini ITX Tower Case (£83.99) Power Supply: Corsair RMx 650W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply (£54.98) Operating System: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro OEM (64-bit) (£40.00) Total: £660.51 Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-02-12 07:35 GMT+0000

Every round needs to be contested to some degree. If pistols are significantly nerfed, then every Eco round is just a waste of time, as the outcome is pretty much guaranteed unless your enemies are absolutely shit.

So you want pistols to be an inferior weapon in every single way? Ok then, R.I.P. all armour pistol buys and any chance for ecos to win. Just because they are cheap they shouldn't be horrendous.

The overarching problem with pistols is whether or not you are balancing them for the pistol round, or general play. For the pistol round, that works fine; but movement is paramount when facing rifles, as it is the main advantage a pistol user has. A balance is required, perhaps making the $500 pistols good at moving, and the free ones not, encouraging more people to buy the $500 pistols and no armour.

I don't understand why EVERYONE wants pistols to be nerfed (except for Tec-9, that is OP). The whole point of pistols is the flexibility with them; moving, etc. They need to be good enough to land 2 hit HS at least. You could argue that the 1-hit kill up close is bad with the p250 and $500 pistols, but buff the M4s and that is essentially not a problem. also for pistol rounds it is simple, buff money to $1k so that you can get head armor. That solves the 'luck' you talk about, and while there is some luck, strategy is very important on pistol round.

I like to play with the scout/AWP (although I am better with the scout), if my team has no AWPer already. When O do, I am always faced with a dilemma as to side arm. I currently have the CZ-75 Auto equipped iPod both sides, which many people disagree with; but I wanted to hear your opinions on this. The CZ DOES take too long to pull out if you are suddenly up close, so you will die - big disadvantage there. But the thing with the CZ is it is basically a very close up shotgun; I can be, say, jump scouting on mirage b apps, but if there are too many of them, I can crouch in the corner with the CZ and get a kill on players expecting sniper rifles. With the Five-Seven/Tec-9, the opposite is true. Which would you pick?

'update status'

I cannot even get it in England, like what?

I use 800DPI and 2 In-Game Sensitivity.... But to be fair my mousepad is tiny (Corsair MM200 Gen 2 Compact Edition) So 1600eDPI, which feels natural, but is probably a tad slow as I cannot do a 180 without lifting up my mouse, I can do about 160.

I hate how the profiles are seperate from the posts. I also dislike reputation rather than likes, but love the fact that I managed to post in LTT Official claiming EA had taken over LMG, before the bug was patched.

Both

I make that 3 minutes since I posted the bug to it being removed. GG.... but I really want that LMG game...

They should fit fine. They have fairly large cups. As for quick reply....

For under $100, wireless is not really a decent option, as you will be sacrificing a lot of sound quality. The Sennheiser HD 558s are good: http://www.amazon.com/Sennheiser-HD-558-Headphones/dp/B004FEEY9A/ref=sr_1_3?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1454145345&sr=1-3&keywords=hd+598