kenjigreat

I'm not using V-sync in Control panel or Game Options . Still spazzes.

Its not a V-Sync issue its an SLI Issue. I don't use V-Sync ever .

Only the best Star Wars Game Ever. I tried installing it a while ago. The UI Does NOT Scale at all for 4K Displays . For mods. Some Files go into the override. Others have an executable that changes the files.

Google VSR For AMD Cards and DSR for Nvidia Cards . Be prepared though. It will kill frames.

What is the general consensus here for those who have owned and ran the game? I've been hearing mixed reaction to the port quality. Honestly I think the SLI scaling for this game is mediocre .

Yep its an SLI Issue. Tested it. The AA in this game is pretty bad . Only rendering it at 4K solves it. But I can't mantain a stable framerate for that so I give up till they release TXAA or something.

Just tried . It spazzes out again.

I have gamed for 15 years and never seen this effect until today.

I swear if they don't fix this I am never using a Dual GPU Setup again. This Glitch happens in the first 10minutes of the game . How does this slip by?

Am I somehow the only one that has this issue? Its really immersion breaking.

I cannot find any information about this glitch. My frame rate is at a stable 60FPS but the Water effects and Snow Avalanches Stutter like crazy I seem to be the Only one having it. No information online. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43oh...ature=youtu.be i7-4790K 2Way SLI -980 16GB Ram SSD Frame rate : 55-70+ Resolution : 1440p SMAA Shadow Quality : High Textures : High Ambient Occlusion : On DOF : Off Pure Hair : Very High Tessellation : On Motion Blur : On Bloom : On Screen Space Reflection : On Sun Soft Shadows : On

I will buy a Console as long as Naughty Dog is console exclusive.

It runs worse and Looks worse , check the Neogaf Post we have the version with missing graphical effects.

http://community.wbgames.com/t5/Support-for-PC/June-23-Update-on-PC-Performance-PLEASE-READ-FIRST/m-p/572903#U572903 Read this Quote from the Website 'The Recommended Spec is intended to deliver an experience on par with the current generation of gaming platforms.' Arkham Knight Requires a GTX 760 for its recommended specs. http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1069190 Check Neogaf , we have the version with Missing AO , Rain effects , not only that the GTX 760 runs WORSE than the PS4. LOL.

I'll still get the the PS4 CE because its already shipped and I'm too lazy to ship it back, but never again am I buying a PC game from WarnerBros and Rocksteady.

Yep , a long time ago , I'm going to buy the game thrice, PS4 Edition while waiting for my PS4 Collector's Edition . PC version comes out 2 weeks later on 15 September. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metal_Gear_Solid_V:_The_Phantom_Pain

Except for Arkham Knight , don't even expect 60FPS with your setup.

Sigh , I seriously hope that Kojima Productions makes a good port for Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain. Not sure whether its good news or bad news but playing an hr of Arkham Knight before requesting my refund killed my desire to play the game. I'm not hyped up and my PS4 edition is going to take 2 weeks to arrive.

I actually got myself a refund , honestly I planned on buying the game twice , once on PC to while waiting for my PS4 CE to get shipped. But god damn the PC version is horrible. I heard the PS4 Version is fine so I'll play that when it comes.

You want to drop 20 frames in less than 0.5 seconds , turn on the Afterburner on the Batmobile. Seriously WTF, how on earth this is allowed is beyond me.

How is Arkham Knight allowed to launch on PC in this state is beyond me , I didn't need to play for more than 2 hrs and I already requested a refund from Steam. Ironically I preordered the CE of this game way back for PS4(5months ago). I mean seriously , how badly optimized can a game get , Turning on the afterburner on the Batmobile drops 20 FRAMES. The same scene in-doors can fluctuate by 20 frames. The game itself feels kinda meh but I'm more angry about how badly this game runs on GTX SLI 980s. I just wonder if Developers just don't give a fuck about making their game run well on PC or are they just bad at their jobs.

Crysis 3 actually looks really good on Low . Compared to most games the visual difference isn't huge.

I mean basegame , which is why I don't even think Witcher 2 counts since Ubersampling is like running the Highest crazy possible anti-aliasing or increasing the resolution to 4K.

I am curious , I've tried many games , Ground Zeroes, Skyrim , The Batman Games , the only game that had somewhat of a big difference is Tomb Raider , but thats mainly due to TressFx making the character model look better , the actual environments don't really improve significantly. The reason I ask this question is I remember CD Projekt Red saying that the Ultra settings for their game was very different from 'High' or to that effect. Obviously it wasn't true , but are there games that do show great differences?

Is it worth playing? Does it get much better because it is starting off really really slow for an action game where you play as Batman. Thats the main reason I've been so lazy in completing this game.