-
Posts
8,712 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About GuiltySpark_
- Birthday Oct 22, 1986
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Member title
say bottleneck one more time
System
-
CPU
Ryzen 9 7800x3D
-
Motherboard
Asrock X670E Taichi
-
RAM
32GB G.Skill DDR5-6000 CL30
-
GPU
Asus TUF 4090 OC
-
Case
Fractal Torrent
-
Storage
1TB Western Digital SN770 / 2TB Western Digital SN770 / 2TB Samsung 860 Evo SATA
-
PSU
SuperFlower Leadex Platinum SE 1000W
-
Display(s)
LG C2 42"
Asus 34" PG348Q
NZXT 27" 27Q -
Cooling
DeepCool Assassin IV
-
Keyboard
GMMK Pro
-
Mouse
Logitech G502X
-
Sound
JBL 104 Speakers / Sennheiser HD650 w/ Schiit Stack
-
Operating System
Windows 11
-
Laptop
Dell XPS 13 9360
-
Phone
iPhone 12 Pro Max
- PCPartPicker URL
Recent Profile Visitors
5,141 profile views
GuiltySpark_'s Achievements
-
Which of these GPUs are the best?
GuiltySpark_ replied to PapaAquaWet's topic in New Builds and Planning
The decision should be between 4070 and 4070 Super as those are completely different cards. The brand/model of each is much less important. For example, if its a 4070, no matter if Asus, Gigabyte or Zotac make it they're all going to perform within margin of error of eachother. Warranties these days are all essentially the same so generally the only difference is going to be noise and cooling. A somewhat (but not foolproof) method is get the one with the largest cooler. -
Assuming you want to maintain PBO for Curve Optimizer undervolting, B650/E is the way to go (X670/E is a joke in ITX). Given that, there are realistically only 5 options. https://pcpartpicker.com/products/motherboard/#s=41&f=8&c=160,161&sort=price&page=1 If the $200 B650I Lightning Wifi does everything you need as far as I/O, I can't suggest spending any more money. The only one I would NOT suggest is the Asrock B650E PG-ITX Wifi as its, at least has been, the only B650/X670 board produced without BIOS flashback.
-
Is it worth to upgrade from Rx 6600 to Rx 6600XT?
GuiltySpark_ replied to damian61's topic in Graphics Cards
No. Save for a true generational upgrade. -
You’re using “GPU” encoding now, just the iGPU on your Intel CPU. QuickSync is very good and very fast, I’d suggest leaving it as it is.
-
Likely due to using hardware encoding. If you use x265 without QuickSync it'll use your whole CPU, however it'll be slower. Potentially much slower. You want to keep it how it is.
-
Can my gaming laptop support 1440p external monitor for gaming
GuiltySpark_ replied to Cryogenic's topic in Displays
I answered this in detail in your last topic. -
I Need a 240hz 1440p for less than 300 unless necessary
GuiltySpark_ replied to Fireord36's topic in Displays
1080p? 1440p? 4K? -
Stop thinking about it as "fake vs. real", but hardware accelerated vs. software. https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/whats-the-difference-between-hardware-and-software-accelerated-ray-tracing/ If you use the RT cores Nvidia has been packing into their cards as an example:
-
Over twice as fast is pretty different.
-
I see this a lot in channels that cover this from a pixel peeping perspective but I have to say, this just isn't my experience in person. I played through all of Jedi Survivor using FSR Quality prior to them adding DLSS and frankly, once they did and I switched, I really could tell the difference let alone have it affect my enjoyment of the video game. 4090/4K LG C2. Personally at this point just having one of the available technologies available (at least if you're on Nvidia) should be sufficient. Anyway..