moderategamer

The current implementations of x86 compatible processors are really a RISC back-end with a CISC compatible front-end. Even people found when developing RISC that  if you used simple CISC instructions that performance would improve. But also note that this was back in the 80s, I'm pretty sure Intel, AMD, and other x86 stakeholders have found ways to mitigate much of the penalty for more complicated instructions.  Also the x86 architecture relied on various other front-end features to improve performance, like OOE, branch prediction, etc. Some of which are relatively new to ARM because implementing them in hardware up until then was prohibitively expensive power-wise.
 
Besides that, I don't think the instruction set architecture (ISA) itself is what makes a processor better or worse. Rather, it's the implementation of it. Ever wonder why Apple's SoCs dominate the performance field even though other ARM compatible processors can't touch it? It's because of how Apple implemented the architecture. Similarly, how AMD implemented x86 during the Athlon/Athlon XP days compared to Intel's Pentium 4 allowed them to make processors that were much more efficient.
 
So I'm led to believe if you know what you're doing, the complexities of a given ISA have minimal impact.
 
EDIT: I'd also recommend reading the top answer at https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2679882/why-is-x86-ugly-why-is-it-considered-inferior-when-compared-to-others
 
EDIT 2: Another thing to take note, this time from AnandTech (Emphasis added):
 
 

You know what Zen does? It makes multiple chiplets.
 
You kniw ARM follow the exact same rules at x86 with cores and everything. X86 cores are larger because they contain a lot more instructionbits. Like AVX execution units and much more. 
 
ARM runs into the same issues. 
 
I mean i believe i watched it a while back or another similar one. Also no can do because classes. Also the arguments are allways the same. 

There isn´t a clear line between cisc and risc anymore because they both want to reduce the power consumed. 

this is the issue with the entire statement.
 
as long as that condition remains, only very few people will feel the need to move ship.

only if they can get a good adoption rate, but people are reluctant to upgrade their OS, I find it hard to believe that they'll switch to ARM because of future possibilities, X86-64 won't be around forever probably, but I don't think it is going anywhere for the mainstream anytime soon.
 
windows 10 is just closing in on 40% market share, nearly 4 years after release. Other than smaller usecases, there is no mainstream adoption of ARM based CPUs yet. there isn't any data to even suggest it is doomed yet, and intel and AMD can choose to make certain instructions obsolete and trim down the bloat if they want to.

Risk V is my hope for the future, but I don't think we will get there for quite a while

x86 (or more specificly, x86_64) isnt doomed yet. the big achilles heel about ARM is that it has some specific workloads it REALLY sucks at. and while x86 is indeed rather bloated, CISC just has its benefits, as well as 30 years of x86 market domination being a thing that'll be hard to win against.

ARM could take over, but only in an indirect way as they can't directly attack x86 as a drop in replacement.
 
ARM is already all over mobile devices.
ARM can find niche but significant uses in server as the applications are more specific.
Apple could use custom ARM cores as the basis for their future desktop line to get away from dependence on Intel.
Windows PCs will arguably be the hardest nut to crack.
 
Putting aside software/OS compatibility, my biggest reason for not looking at ARM, at least in the short term, is that it is still orientated at lower power, lower performance compared to what we're used to. I don't know if it is possible scale up ARM cores to give higher performance, possibly at the cost of power consumption.

I've done that before, and this one is not symmetrical unfortunately. Even if it was, it's hard to balance and loud, only good as a temp solution. 

I mean I don't agree that 5G can be harmful to us but I do believe we should get complete 4G coverage before we start introducing 5G. Although it would be cool to be able to game on 5G anywhere.

Just saying.

$Too.Much

Atom was what i used throughout web dev class

Probly

If it's acrylic based then acetone should do the trick but I really have no idea what it's made of so you'll need to research it

Yes that could be it, as often when Jerry does it he can peel it off, instead of scratching it. I might try what u suggested thanks 

Why?
And what? 

Why?
 
Are they technologically inclined?  Is this a Technology class?  Are there other classmates who claim superiority? 
That wouldn't be Technologically Knowledgeable.  

Jesus christ are you 10 years old? 
 
EDIT: Sees mod post above me.
 
Uh... you should... uh... just fix the teacher's problems when they come up.
 
See, not a worthless post.

Just add more weight than it will actually be and you'll be good, It'll cost you a bit more but not much.

Source: Planetside 2 6th anniversary dev stream 
 
Quotes: (dragged to 39:46 in for the mic drop announcement)
 
Opinions: I cannot wait. A game runing in DX9 is stuck in the past, this has been long overdue. You kiddos can think you're having fun in fortnite, but this is a true MMOFPS.

I know my answer: my baby mama

Not a meme but this just popped up on my YT feed and it's pretty damn funny.
 
 
 

Glad someone else appreciates him. IIRC he also won a NASA competition, the dude is legendary and smart.
This guy is the stuff of legends, easily my favorite dev of any game ever.
Edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armadillo_Aerospace
This man was doing Elon Musk level stuff before most people cared about Elon Musk!

I think he was joking, that's how I read it anyway.