babadoctor

Well if you're ever in Australia use Aldi prepaid.

You might want to look into TheThingsNetwork which runs on LoRa.
I think this article explains some of it
https://www.thingforward.io/techblog/2017-09-27-getting-started-with-lorawan-thethingsnetwork-and-platformio.html

You could use the native library 'fs'. and use a method of that library that is readdirSync()
var fs = require('fs'); var files = fs.readdirSync('/path/to/dir/') /* now files is an Array of the name of the files in the folder and you can pick a random name inside of that array */ let chosenFile = files[Math.floor(Math.random() * files.length)] the discord part seems correct, only that you need to change the path to the image to
'/path/to/image/' + chosenFile P.S. you could use the variable '__dirname' which is the path of the current module so for example if your .js is in '/home/user/Project/discord-bot/app.js' and you need the image in '/home/user/Project/discord-bot/images/image.jpg' you can just write __dirname + '/images/image.jpg'

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant
Keyboard: Cooler Master - MasterKeys L Wired Gaming Keyboard  ($79.75 @ Amazon) 
Mouse: Logitech - G502 Proteus Spectrum Wired Optical Mouse  ($52.00 @ Amazon) 
Total: $131.75
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2018-07-28 14:01 EDT-0400
 
Here's a relative idea of what you would be looking at.

Promises are like callbacks, it means that part of the code will be executed only when the promise is resolved.
 
Bare with me I'm on my phone, so say you were using nodeJs and making an api request
 
const got = require('got'); const results = got.get('http://example.com/data/123'); console.log(results)  
Because the got request is async it will fire of the get request then move on to the console.log and you'll get undefined.
 
Now got returns a promise so
 
const got = require('got'); got.get('http://example.com/data/123').then((results) =>{     console.log(results) })    
This will cause the event loop to wait until the promise is resolved before doing the console.log
 
What is great about promises is the  you can chain .then and what ever is returned from that function is passed to the next one.

Apples and oranges. a promise in JS seems to be a way to write asynchronous code (i've never written concurrent JS, so i could be wrong), while an arraylist in java is just an implementation of an abstract data type. The only semi-related aspect of arraylist is that there are concurrency concerns in that arraylists are not synchronized so you need to be careful if you have multiple threads operating on the same list.

that would do it. chrome is... weird.

Would it not be a better idea to try modify the controller to send signals on the antenna? 

You could use a software defined radio like HackRF One or in some cases much cheaper ones made based on some DVB-T receivers. That gives you access to raw radio signal and not what WiFi chip is processing to be WiFi channels.

More critically: It's highly unlikely that the system can in any way have direct access to the WiFi radio signal. Much more likely would be that the WiFi card's controller handles all the radio stuff and then just hands the decoded data to the system much like a normal, wired, NIC.

On another point, "2.4 GHz" usually means a range of frequencies that are close enough to 2.4 GHz (also known as the 2.4 GHz band). It doesn't actually mean these devices run at 2.4 GHz. For example, 802.11n channel 1 is at 2.412 GHz while channel 11 is at 2.462 GHz.

Don't forget the possiblities of phase shifting and frequency shifting.

No, RC uses FHSS technologies and specific frequencies which wifi equipment can't receive.
It is not as simple as 2.4GHz = 2.4GHz.

Do you have an .ISO file for Windows 7? If so, download Rufus online, and use an 8GB USB to burn the .ISO file onto the USB. Then install Windows 7 as you would. 
 
Congratulations on 4000 posts by the way. @babadoctor

Docsis 3.1 can 10 Gbps down and 2 Gbps up on coax, Docsis 3.0 and above uses channel bonding. Where they take multiple frequencies/ channels to do download and upload, Which is why they can hit those fast speeds. . Moca 2.0 can do up to about 800 Mbps. The adapters you linked do not follow the Moca standard, which sucks, dont buy those. Moca can exist with cable and internet running thru the coax. Moca uses the higher frequencies on the line basically 1 Ghz to 1.5 Ghz, While the cable co uses 5 mhz to 950 Mhz on the line currently, though  Docsis 3.1 can use up to 1.2 Ghz, many cable co's do use up to that yet. 

It's more of a "how much signal can you cram down a pipe without dropping it" thing.  Not sure it has a law.  Somewhat like how Wifi is getting faster but there's only so much you can do with the 2.4Ghz channels.

Now that you've specifically stated what you were after I refer to my previous answer: there isn't an IEEE standard to allow us to do that (the Technology and standard have to exist to allow the wire to do that).  At least not in any way readily available to consumers.  I am aware of fiber solutions that do that very well that are far more available.  I think it's safe to say that if you really want to move files in a LAN above 10Gb in speed, you've hit single-mode fiber territory and need to get fiber NICs for your hosts, and a fiber network switch (possibly also an adapter or fiber termination for the router).

Any business, scientific consortium, or datacenter who needs a similarly extreme tier of network throughput often resorts to a proprietary (freaking expensive) solution for their needs.  In an example I'm lightly familiar with, when Cray Research builds networks for their super computers, they don't use standard Base T copper protocols.  They built the Ares interconnect chip and started with copper (prior to 2015), and ended up with fiber in their modern proprietary network solution.  Anyone who can afford that kind of budget isn't worried about using coax or Cat 5e copper.  They build out and pay what they want to suit exactly the network they want.

With 40GBASE-T and Cat8 cables we could, but neither which really exist yet.

yeah my own browser i would like to redirect domains that begin with specific prefix
 
i figured it out though

hmmmmmm