Equlix

Being dyslexic myself I see this update as an absolute win.

Copper and nickel have almost the same anodic index, so galvanic corrosion should not happen outside of extreme conditions.

It boggles my mind that any sane tech enthusiasts would actually advacat for a license or block on doing a type processing on their own gear. I get that mining is annoying but you cannot un-ring that bell. 

ln2 on the 7920x 

These things take a long time to develop. maybe the pixel 4. definitely not the pixel 2

Intel being involved in an antitrust lawsuit but on the plaintiff side. Thats some high level hypocrisy right there.

Intel being involved in an antitrust lawsuit but on the plaintiff side. Thats some high level hypocrisy right there.

Intel being involved in an antitrust lawsuit but on the plaintiff side. Thats some high level hypocrisy right there.

Intel being involved in an antitrust lawsuit but on the plaintiff side. Thats some high level hypocrisy right there.

Intel being involved in an antitrust lawsuit but on the plaintiff side. Thats some high level hypocrisy right there.

Intel being involved in an antitrust lawsuit but on the plaintiff side. Thats some high level hypocrisy right there.

Intel being involved in an antitrust lawsuit but on the plaintiff side. Thats some high level hypocrisy right there.

Intel being involved in an antitrust lawsuit but on the plaintiff side. Thats some high level hypocrisy right there.

Intel being involved in an antitrust lawsuit but on the plaintiff side. Thats some high level hypocrisy right there.

Intel being involved in an antitrust lawsuit but on the plaintiff side. Thats some high level hypocrisy right there.

Intel being involved in an antitrust lawsuit but on the plaintiff side. Thats some high level hypocrisy right there.

Intel being involved in an antitrust lawsuit but on the plaintiff side. Thats some high level hypocrisy right there.

Intel being involved in an antitrust lawsuit but on the plaintiff side. Thats some high level hypocrisy right there.

wut. I haven't been on the forums in a while and I come back to find that the everyone's favorite master baiter is banned? The mods are absolute mad men. Mage must be bored af now though.

Low speed precision and array size is worse as well, but  its a budget product compared to the Pro, and quite ahead of the sub 40$ competition.

That makes me more curious about big vega and scaling with HMB2 Than with the 580 refresh.

Because Wendell was the smart one.

Good, now you just need to show that there weren't any chances between Vista and 7, as well as no changes between 8.1 and 10.
Because your argument wasn't that 7 and 8 were different. Your argument was that Vista and 7 were almost identical, and 8.1 and 10 were almost identical. That only 7 to 8 contained any significant changes.
You have also been consistently wrong with everything else you have said, but it seems like you won't even bother responding to those things. For example you seem to think that just because Windows 10 has a few more check boxes ticked on some security feature checklist it automatically makes it more secure, despite the fact that I have linked evidence that Windows 10 had more publicly known security vulnerabilities than Windows 7 last year. You can't use the argument "it should be safer" against hard facts and statistics indicating the opposite.
 
Also, if you think that article contains "hilarious low level info" then your standards for what's low level must be incredibly low. That article is a very basic overview of things that changed. It contains next to no "low level" info, unless you count things like "they removed transparency!" as "low level".
 
And once again, you're just repeating what others have said instead of making your own arguments. You're ignoring my questions and just linking to some article which doesn't even prove your previous statement. At best it proves 1/3 of a single statement you made, but you made several really dumb ones.
 
 
 
I disagree. I think both Windows 8 and Windows 10 has a lot of really good improvements and brand new features compared to 7. Too bad Windows 10 also comes with lots of HIV hidden underneath the surface.

Then how can you be sure that they have actually changed things?
If you (I know it wasn't you but for some reason you jumped in) say that Vista to 7 had basically no changes, but 7 to 8 had major differences in the kernel then you should have at least a little bit of facts to back your statement up with. You can't hide behind "it's proprietary so we don't know what changed" when you're the one saying things has changed.
It's like saying Santa Claus is real and when asked for evidence go "well it's magic, I don't have to explain shit".
 
WDDM was changed between Windows Vista and Windows 7 as well. What is your point?
And yes, WDDM 1.1 was backported to Vista afterwards, but even then it still doesn't support everything that is supported in 7 such as rendering GDI calls in hardware.
 
No no no no. You made the argument. You back it up. I should not do your research to prove your point.
(By the way, Windows 7 has a different version of NDIS compared to Vista too)
 
RAM compression was introduced in Windows 10, not 8.
 
[Citation Needed] on Windows 8 having "Windows Subsystem for Linux kernel changes".
I assume you are referring to Interix, but the latest version of that (6.1) runs on Windows 7 too, and support was completely dropped for versions after Windows 8 and I think it was removed in Windows 8.1.
So I guess you are right in that they made "changes" to it. They completely removed it.
 
 
 
Your answers and only vague if you don't know what you're talking about. If you don't know what you're talking about then you shouldn't say anything to begin with.
If your statements are based on facts, and you want to argue that X is better than Y, then you need facts and evidence to support your stance. If all you got are vague "well I think they changed something, but I don't know what or why, but I am sure it is better!" then quite frankly you should shut the hell up.
 
 
I am sick and tired of people who doesn't know the first thing about operating systems tell others how much better X is than Y, when they don't have any facts to back their statements up with. And yes, it's not just Windows fanboys I am sick and tired of. I've been hearing "OS X is great because it's Unix! It's the most advanced OS in the world!" and "I use Linux because it is better than Windows" for over a decade now, and every time I ask people why they said that statement they have no fucking idea what they are talking about 90% of the time. It is very rare that I get a real answer. It seems like 90% of people think OS 1 is better than OS 2 because some other clueless idiot told them it was better, and they never questioned it. Or they did question it but then they didn't understand the answer and just went "wow he sounds smart because I have no idea what he just said. I'll just parrot what he said then I might sound smart too!"
 
 
@Curufinwe_wins I am waiting on clarifications and answers.

Rockchip
 
Haha fail