qhgf

I wouldn't put all of them in parallel, the "flow will split equally among all of the components" property only works when the blocks have the same resistence, because fluids take the path of least resistance, you might end up with your CPU block getting more flow than your GPUs do because the block is less resistive. If there's a way that you can make sure all of the blocks have the same or relatively similar resistance, then you should be fine.

although 5.5Gb+.5Gb vram would be funny, If the 980ti has the same ROPs and L2 as the Titan X, there won't be a divided memory pool. The 3.5+.5 on the 970 has nothing to do with the disabled SMs, only the L2/ROP cluster affects the "memory pools"

People should remember that Nvidia has a lot of gm200 chips that can't be sold as a Titan X because of a few SMs not working from not perfect yields. Releasing this might hurt Titan X sales, but at least they can sell some of their previously unusable GPUs.

So as of now, I'm trying to run 3 LG 25UM65-P monitors along with my Asus VG248QE off of my GTX 970 with old I/O. the problem is that with all four monitors set to extended, my Aero turns off. since I have a black theme installed, having aero off really destroys my desktop. I've tried doing the registry edit along with many of the other "common" fixes to aero disabling, but the only thing that has worked so far is disabling one of my monitors (the VG248QE) then restart my computer to get aero running again. But as soon as I extend to the VG248QE again, aero automatically disables. I'm not sure if this is a graphics limitation or a software limitation, because while I was waiting for a functional displayport cable to be shipped to be, I was running all four of these off of my 970 along with my old 660 that is still lying around, and I had no problem with aero. I realize its a long shot, but I figured with the number of people using multiple 4k monitors increasing maybe someone has ran into the same problem.

Banned for making me hungry

K well Idk if anyone who made this case has a brain, but the most energy consuming part of your phone is the touchscreen. I mean unless you're a strange person who doesn't actually like to use your phone on a regular basis. Snake oil to the max

When people think that having 7 devices on a single access point is going to severely degrade the performance. Even when none of the devices are using the network resources.

That picture says that the 980 requires 1x 6pin and 1x 8pin... Very credible... Even with that being said, I really don't have a reason to doubt that nvidia will change their marketing strategy from the 700 series

My Mom thought a HDMI port was an Ethernet port once.

I think it has something to do with windows/directX just not being able to run a high framerate window along with any more than a few other simple windows like afterburner or something else with not much movement. Chrome seems to especially tank your FPS, even with just a static image up. The best solution I found was just to suck it up and minimize most of my other windows.

Vessel: Qhgf Videos: Hardline Water Cooled PC Build Log: https://www.vessel.com/videos/JYZEYDYx0 LG 34UM67 Ultrawide FreeSync Monitor: https://www.vessel.com/videos/G-DUjgUyY

I do a lot of video rendering, so the OC is handy, I am considering getting another cooler which is why I wanted some kind of idea for my chip, because I'd be willing to spend a bit to decrease times. But I don't have any voltage increase like you said because of the heat and instability.

I know they're not technically binned, but meh. I guess a binned one would be a 3960x or something.

80c is the highest readout after 6-8 hour burn in

So I have an Intel 3930k which I am currently running at 4.1 Ghz with 1.29 vcore, I know the simple answer is to add more volts and keep turning up the clock speed, the problem is that I have a very inadequate 120mm aio liquid cooler, and I'm staying just under 80c at my current settings.