Jump to content

ivan134

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    7,737

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by ivan134

  1. ivan134
    What model is your 480?
  2. ivan134
    Also the price comes from the fact that Asus always charges a premium for their name.
  3. ivan134
    Power color is a decent brand. They're AMD exclusive
  4. ivan134
    Get the red devil. Asus dual cooler is terrible
  5. ivan134
    Borderlands and Warframe are the better games in this genre, and I'm hoping Anthem is closer to those 2. From the little bit I've seen, it seems closer to those 2. I'm fine with no end game if the normal playthrough is really good, like Borderlands.
  6. ivan134
    Game is fun. I can't compare it to others because the last BF I played was bfbc2
  7. ivan134
    Smash Bros 64 Smash Bros Melee Borderlands 2 Transistor 007 Goldeneye Perfect Dark Power Stone 2 WarFrame Far Cry 3 Halo 1 PC Gears of War 1 PC
  8. ivan134
    I reaaaaally wanna buy Anthem, but if EA keeps this up...
  9. ivan134
    Losing silicon lottery =/= twin frozr is bad
  10. ivan134
    What makes is suck? and I'm not sure how your friend's motherboard is related
  11. ivan134
    One of their cards die on you or something?
  12. ivan134
    Yup
  13. ivan134
    I know that, but it doesn't matter who owns them. If it's not govt owned, obviously a person or corporation owns them. They still register as news. For example, Jeff Bezos owns The Washington Post. That doesn't mean they're registered as a retail company.
  14. ivan134
    Yup. That's definitely it. You got me. You win
  15. ivan134
    Fox News is registered as an entertainment company and not a news one, so even their "news" shows don't have to abide by that.
  16. ivan134
    LOL. I don't even know how to respond to this.
  17. ivan134
    No, it shouldn't, and it never will. Your tax dollars don't fund them.
  18. ivan134
    They already do have well defined limitations. The problem is, freedom of speech doesn't apply to social media.
  19. ivan134
    The cognitive dissonance levels are over 9000.
  20. ivan134
    Please, spare us your faux outrage. Why aren't you people calling for heavily regulating Fox News, BreitBart or National Review if you claim to care about "media affecting what the population sees and hear"?
  21. ivan134
    I'm not a free market guy. It was a tongue in cheek comment. I'm all for heavily regulating and taxing corporations.
  22. ivan134
    They're really having an issue with seeing something like Facebook as basically an extension of Mark Zukerberg's house. You cannot go into his house and do or say whatever you want. If it bothers them so much, they should start their own social media companies and allow all the conspiracy nut jobs run wild.
  23. ivan134
    You're talking about trading, and I'm talking about ownership. A company is either privately or publicly owned. Publicly owned means it's run by the government. Private is the opposite of that. You're correcting a straw man.
  24. ivan134
    Are you saying that China wasn't abusing human rights before the advent of social media?
  25. ivan134
    Okay, and? They're a private company. They can choose to let their users see only what they choose. When I go to BreirtBart or National Review, are they infringing on my rights by not posting factual news?
×