woll3

Anything with A5050 or PAW3606 is trash.

Mostly Debounce Times, also its only a vocal minority.

PLN2033 introduced "Dynamic CPI Scaling", where if you are moving the mouse slowly or not at all the cpi are getting reduced to a minimum in an attempt to make sure that for example subwoofers arent causing any unintentional cursor movement, obv. this combined with PTE´s rather bad low speed abilities caused a weird a cursorfeel with a high movement treshold.

Nah its 120+g, but it has good feet and obv. a lot of surface to grip on making it feel lighter than it is at slower movement speeds, however at faster swipes you can still feel it in your arm.

Please dont tell me that it is this "Flawless Sensor List" or whatever it was called.

Jitter, Variance and angle Snapping can be easily tested by everyone at home, and if you dont feel a difference between sensors and/or mice, you either dont know enough or you dont play enough to talk about this topic.

Movement treshold and the reason for it, it would be interesting to know if it is due to none adjustable CPI scaling or just a limit of the new PTE.

It is about CPI Variance every optical system has, some like A9500 have more than what can be considered tolerable.

You are confusing G100 with G100s, AM010 is useable at higher cpi than A3055.

*AM010

G100s uses the old AM010 SROM with 1ms smoothing 500hz cap and obv. a different multiplier, still feels better than PMW3310H(imo), malfunction speed is ~3m/s so depending on your sensitivity you might need something else, Asus Sica for example.

They can mean something, like tampering with the LOD at the cost of performance, or having weirdly calculated steps. :> *3200, altough it is still true considering featureset.

I think its rather more due to previous discussions about Finalmouse, like how te Company lied about using a different Lens, which woiuldnt make any sense with PMW3310H anyway. No, just standard PMW3310H with half way decent FW and all its pro´s and con´s.

It´s like this: A3060 Family: A3060-->A3070-->A3080(A3080E) -->S3668(Razer Exclusive)-->S3888(Razer Exclusive)-->A3090(Public S3888)-->S3095(Logitech´s A3090) A3050 Family: A5050(Office Sensor)-->A3050-->A3055(Logitech Exclusive) A9800 Family: A9500-->S9500(Logitech´s A9500) -->A9800-->S9808(Logitechs A9800)-->S9818/S9819(Razer´s A9800) -->S3988/S3989 -->PMW3310H AM010 Family: AM010(Logitech proprietary)-->PMW3320 PMW3366 Family: PMW3366-->TBA Maybe i make a proper Flowchart with Date´s and stuff, but im lazy.

To me it is not the Sensor, but the Fact that it is essentially DA 3G with PMW3310, that is what i am getting at, that you get something recycled which was only updated when a Component went EOL.

Brah, do you even read?

PMW3320 is the most recent Sensor, also see: http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/354373-mouse-sensor-listand-mcu%C2%B4s-ltt-edition/

Not using the best components available and using an 8 Year Old Design(and Components) that originally was rejected(by Razer) is cutting corners.

If anything technically an upgrade due to higher FPS, CPI, and smaller casing. From a purely technical Hirarchy, S3988 would stand on top, then A9800 and then PMW3310H. S3988/S3989 and PMW3310 have the same Variance given same circumstances, which is worse than the previous Generations. PMW3310H(and S3988) are also not really raw, close but not what you can consider raw, especially with Zowie´s FW. I am talking MCU and Syncing. Still a saving that doesnt reach the Consumer. There is no need for testing considering specs, the difference between 3310 and 3988/3989 is basically Case, FPS and max multiplier. PMW3310 is more common due to price and case, you can just reuse old PCB´s which you have prior used for A3090/3080/etc., which comes pretty handy for corner cutters like Zowie.

Everything, PMW3310 is basically a direct downgrade of S3988/S3989 in 20dip case, MC9S08JM32 has not the weird bursts the CY7C64215 has, and Zowie is still using Huano, altough different ones, not sure if that was the right call considering recent debounce time decrease and the leverage of the Shelldesign.

No, it still depends on the circumstances, one example would be combining Roccat Savu and Hiro, which would lead to it malfunctioning even at a snails pace.

I personally couldnt care less about buttons, the only thing i care about is how well i perform, and if a certain model helps me in that regard i am willing to give up the browsing comfort. I also never bind anything to a mouse since i have to constantly be able to aim properly.

From an objective POV, the Deathadder due to best performance(3989 combined with good FW), the Rival would be in the middle due to its featureset, and the EC1-A would be last because it is basically a simplified DA 3G from 2007 with PMW3310 and offers the worst bang for buck. Practically i would say to get all three of them to test them out and sent the other two back, if possible.

Not to mention that it is not true considering Hardware.

That is because 3888 only has two native steps, 1800 and 3500cpi. An issue that i see is actually the Location, NA essentially gets the pleb treatment because its console dominated and mostly the ultra cheap stuff sells, and even gets recommended by some people here on the forums, not to mention that if sales are going slowly chances that you are getting one of the earliest batches are quite high.