woll3
-
Posts
636 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Status Updates
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Downloads
Store Home
Everything posted by woll3
-
3305 is actually an acceptable Option for low CPI useage(meaning under 1200), same goes for the A3050 of the Rival 100, where 1000cpi or under are recommendable. I would rather look elsewhere if you plan to use it on ~1600.
-
It is well known that PAW3305 sucks at upscaling, magnification on the bloody mice is 1.0x at least, with 0.5 the results would be even worse(because 800 is 400 and so on). 1800 is not native btw. CPI itself are a minor reason for jitter when talking about optical systems, it is all about array size and DSP "Power". It´s A4tech.
-
High debounce(which means "button lag" in practice") doesnt prevent doubleclick problems, smart shell design does, which neither the M95 or M65 have in that regard.
-
It makes more sense to save up, the best you can get in that budget is something with a rather bad A3050 implementation or something that uses office sensors anyway. Altough it should be noted that they are severely limited on W8/8.1/10 and if you plan on playing in any leagues.
-
Yet AM010 is the more responsive one, even from an objective technical POV, not even talking about Firmware and MCU.
-
And you say that because?
-
There is quite a bunch to choose from, Asus ROG Sica, Logitech G100S, Ozone Xenon, Roccat Lua, Steelseries Kinzu v3, and the Cougar 230M from the top of my Head. Well, that is rather subjective.
-
Yes. Well, the "medium tier" is standard imo, everything else is below or above. No, as said S3989 is simply S3988 with the capability to interpolate to 10,000cpi,Hardware is unchanged and actual capability is still 8*800 like A9800.
-
S3988 is available to everyone, also everything is PixArt since mid 2012. Thats actually standard, unless you go into the lower end. S3989 is simply S3988 with the capability to interpolate to 10k cpi.
-
Well, there coems a lot together, weight affects mousemoving exponentially and the G502 also doesnt have a lot of surface area to put force on, not to mention the rather bad feet design, unlike the XTD which despite its weight can be moved around rather easily, altough fatiguing after a while.
-
Wasnt needed for S9818/S9819.
-
Changing from A9500 to something else would require different components and a pcb redesign, which is not justifiable from any kind of POV. Rival (300) uses PMW3310 which is the new mid end standard, Kana v2 used A3090, Kinzu V3 was- and Rival 100 is using A3050, which in combination with good FW is sufficient for low cpi usage, Kana v1 and Kinzu v2 are both using 3305dk which is also sufficient for low cpi usage, the Kana V1 more due to the 0.5 Lens which halves CPI and dpubles malfunction speed, comes with homeopathic doses of angle snapping. Ikari Optical had the A3060 with A3080 SROM, which was basically the only option at that time, and Ikari Laser used ONS which had a really high Updaterate and had huge potential. The only real objective fail has been the Kinzu V1 with the VT5366, which ironically comes from the same company which developed MLT04. That´s relative considering current Options, not to mention that 3310 comes with its own shortcomings.
-
Just Manufacturer Spec.
-
Any better wireless mouse than the Logitech G602?
woll3 replied to SteveGrabowski0's topic in Peripherals
Given running time and sensor performance, no there isnt anything better than the G602 atm. -
Will a gaming-oriented mouse help fine-tune my aim?
woll3 replied to RezidentSeagull's topic in Peripherals
Probably, as CPI should fit Sensitivity. -
No, i am actually opposed to such lists because too many people read too much into it or are not thinking at all, altough i shouldnt complain considering that i(and every other player) profit from the marketing machinery as well A similar list was posted a while ago.
-
Higher on native setting and better surfaces (3. something m/s on Taito), FW and illumination are still sucking hard, one of the worst A3090 i ever had, experience is similar to a good A9500.
-
Just Avago´s official spec.
-
For free is a different story, but most about the mouse has already been spoken about and the performance is rather meh.
-
Wouldnt do it.
-
More like null back in 2008, A9500 and derivatives(S9500, A9800, S9808, S9818, S9819) will always have high variance, similar goes for the LED illuminated variants S3988/3989 and PMW3310, altough on a smaller scale, if it would have been a fixable problem, it would have been done long ago instead of developing new platforms e.G. PMW3366.
-
Performancewise, no, RAT 3 doesnt have the best A3090 implementation but it is still okay in compoarison to "chinese stuff", i woulkd suggest 1800cpi for the best performance. If it is too small or not is something you have to decide for yourself, on the upside it is lightweight given actual width.
-
Performance is not a matter of price, if OP´s Pricerange only allows cheap but not good, it would be imo better to save more money and get cheap and good, and not just simply cheap without the "good". . A3050 is below average, and anything with PAN3509´s malfunction speed(which is under 1m/s) is a bad sensor for gaming.
-
A3050 or PAW3305 are the bare minimum to be considered gaming grade, and even then tracking isnt particularly great, even with good implementations, it is not a matter of price. And? The Sensor the Shark Force uses is an Office Sensor(PAN 3509) with low malfunction speed and bad cursorpath, buttons are preference and 125hz is the standard polling rate.
-
Altough it is not a gaming mouse.
