Jump to content

woll3

Member
  • Posts

    636
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by woll3

  1. "Low" malfunction speed is not an issue, only a problem to an individual.
  2. Well it tells you what happened in London. As for the game itself, wasted potential given development since the alpha.
  3. So you are saying that A9800 is better than S3988? Troll somewhere else pls. Also you apparently havent read the thread....
  4. S3988 is better and more expensive than PMW3310, given decent/same FW Quality and latest SROM. PMW3310 is obviously the cheapest. A9800 is the most expensive, but also comes with an integrated lightsource, and obv. it is the worst for the end user. But it makes PCB changes necessary, changing overall costs. Higher Updaterate obviously changes the cursorfeel. Trackinglinearity between S3988 and PMW3310 is the same, and maybe you should rethink what Acceleration in combination with g means. Being both based on A9800(which is 800*8), both could have the same capabilities, and while it doesnt matter to you, it does to some, not to mention the plus in marketing. Rather have 6400cpi without lies than 6500 BS ones. It is the mroe potent option and should be used in the "1% Gear", but it isnt in many cases due to casing, PMW3310 is still the same 20-dip as the A3090-A3060 was. I wasnt talking about the pricing of specific products. Regardless, you dont need to link them because i had both here. I couldnt care less about OCN given that certain people cant understand things like CPI not being limited by the array even after being it told for years. And the only source i can publicly name is Skylit, it also should be understandable that i dont share the "in depth" Datasheets or any Names or Companies.
  5. Wth are you talking about, Pixart bought the patents from Avago, so there is only Pixart left, there are no "Avago" or Pixart Variants, it simply is either PMW3310 or it isnt. S3988/3989 and PMW3310 are based on the A9800, altough S3988 offers a different casing, higher FPS and a higher multiplier, and is also more expensive than PMW3310, PMW3310 being the netry to the mid level.
  6. Given potential of 3988/3989, DA has the better Sensor, which is also more expensive, not to mention that Razer´s FW is better anyway than the one from Mionix because Mionix relies/has to rely on the Factory. Btw. the DA actually saves lightning, polling rate and cpi.
  7. No just back to earth and the reality of things, QC issues are happening everywhere, its just the way it is. http://forums.logitech.com/t5/Logitech-G-Mice/G502-Mouse-feet-issues/td-p/1239532 I wouldnt find it so annoying if people wouldnt recommend products who are inferior performancewise, altough that is kind of its own topic. And fyi, im using a Logitech product right now.
  8. And some people had issues with the G9 and were/are running around "Oh Logitech is so bad, quality has gone downhill, hurr durr" and on the other Hand some people used DA for years. Because it didnt sell, easy as that. Then neither is Corsair because of the scrollwheel or Logitech because of the rattling lens and self destructing feet issues, neither is Zowie for a coating that lasts 2 months and Hardware from 2007, i could go on forever with that. :rolleyes:
  9. Well, Logitech has one major advantage, regardless old G9 had some fitting issues with the shells and the Hyperscroll wheel is still wonky AF, also if i want to talk from my personal perspective i could say it is crap performancewise because it is too heavy and has the S9500, debounce time however is very nice.
  10. Well, everything is overpriced crap then. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQDwGOyggdQ
  11. It was the other way around, Microsoft even used that for marketing. If you really want Corsair, then get at least the M45 instead(because of better performance), also it is not as "perfect"(because it is simply impossible with a ~50$ Product) as everyone makes it out to be, "doubleclicks" can still occour on the M Series despite the high debounce time and a lot of units have rattling mousewheels. So, just pick whatever shape, features, and performance wise fits / offers the best.
  12. Well, Logitechs AM010 is next to unbeatable when it comes to responsiveness, Castor is just standard 3310, not bad but not really good either, i personally didnt like the shape.
  13. Firmware. It depends on what you like when it comes to fast clicking, if you like to click without a lot of force, then go for the Deathadder, altough depending on grip there are better options. Only somebody who is drunk would recommend standard A9800 over a good S3988 implementation.
  14. If you havent noticed, every Peripheral Forum is full with Fanboys. As for the topic, it depends on what you want besides the already mentioned points(Grip etc.), if you want an easy answer to the original question, the Deathadder, due to better performance.
  15. Well, how many buttons do you need?
  16. Swap it with the M45. As for the monitor, it depends on what you want to do and care about.
  17. Not sure where you got your Information from, the problem is simply inherent to A9500, A9800 and derivatives.
  18. Yeah and all of them consist out of listing features and no testing. :>
  19. That shouldnt be called a review, even a press release contains more information. As for the topic, the G502 would offer better performance, so it depends on what you care more about, performance or features.
  20. Florida Man, now available as Bot, what exciting times we are living in.
  21. That depends on the viewpoint, for the consumer the changes have been better tracking due to better firmware(with new MCU), no/bad interpolation, and the change of the M3 switch from TTC to a cheap Panasonic, but the PCB itself is a lot different.
  22. I think the thought here was more, Casual mouse = Casual Games, i would have actually said cookie clicker. Thats rather subjective given weight and shape.
×