Yun4xGaming

Problem Solved. Bought a new monitor and that fixed it.

Done that Today, tried new cables and the Problem still persists. Except for in the Late evenings the Problem disappears and the monitor seems to be working fine until the next day again and then rinse and reppeat.

I will attempt that Tmorrow, however one weird oddity that i've found and probably should've mentioned is that the Flickering stops in the evening, for example today it stopped at around 21:00 switzerland time, and the other days it stopped flickering at around 18:00 or so.

Good Day I had recently updated my Nvidia Graphics drivers to version 511.23(Updated the driver on the 14th January), since a couple of days i've noticed my 2nd monitor started flickering on the lower half. It's very weird because i've had the Monitor for over a year and its been fine up until now. I'm Thinking the Problem is the Driver but if that was the case wouldnt the problem have started immediatly when i installed the Driver? it only started a couple of days ago which makes me worried its a problem with the Monitor. This Problem only happens with my 2nd Monitor, 1st Monitor is fine. Here is a video showing the Problem: So far i have tried Reinstalling the Driver with DDU to no Avail. GPU is an RTX 2080, 1st Monitor is a Viewsonix XG2401, 2nd Monitor is a BenQ BL2410PT. Current Nvidia Driver is 511.23 and i'm not sure which one it was previously, i think it was a fairly old one around 450 something? I can't remember to be honest. Any Help or Ideas would be appreciated.

Disappointed that there's no DLSS equivalent

Wrong. ANY 737MAX has 2 AOA Sensors, one for the Cpt the other one for the FO (FCC1 and FCC2) respectively, Heck even All of the 737NG's flying have 2 AOA sensors, there isnt a 737MAX/NG with 1 Aoa Sensor.

-

Ok Little Update, Problem is Solved! Indeed Updating the BIOS Solved the Issue for me. It's Boosting as High as 4.6Ghz now! I Updated the BIOS Using the Ez Flash 3 Functionality, go into the Bios and then use the Tool and it does it all for you. Thanks for the Help guys

Ok, this might be too much to Ask but do you know a good Tutorial video for updating the Bios on the Asus ROG Strix Z390-F Gaming??

Didn't Work, still not Turboing Yes it was at the Maximum Setting

Max Performance

So i just recently got my 9700K like about 2 days Ago but i've noticed that its not Turbo Boosting at all. It's staying at 3.6Ghz No matter what i do. I haven't Touched the BIOS and Double Checked that Speed Step and Intel Turbo Boost is Enabled. Motherboard is an ASUS Strix ROG Z390 Gaming-F. Here are Two pictures one on Idle Load and the Other one on Max Load using Prime95. Idle: Load:

It's gonna be a long way but i believe it'll Payout, this has been my dream since i've been able to breathe, If you are my Pax one day say Hi

One of the AOA sensors was sending out wrong Information to the ADIRU's whic then commanded those Nose Down Inputs on QF72, you can check out the Final report. Heres the thing with Grounding the plane, as a Mechanic if you get a Report from a pilot about something thats wrong you'll Fix it and Conduct tests according to the AMM Tasks. If the Tests are statisfactory then you'll release the plane again. PK-LQP was "Only" having issues on the last 4 flights. 4Flights is a normal rotation for a Crew, usually Pilots do around 4-6Flights a day. Alteast in Europe. now those 4 issue flights have also been in the timespan of over 3 days, so thats really not that Much. And the Pilots were Satisfied with what the Mechanics have done so there really wasnt a reason to Ground the Plane. Regarding your last question, Hoping to get an ATPL in a Few Years and Currently working on my PPL so yes Where'd you get that Info from? The engines ran fine. Negative, that Red Button on the "Joystick"(Proper Term is Sidestick) is to disconnect the Autopilot OR to take over Priority from the Other Persons sidestick for example if they were flying badly or doing something they shouldn't do in manual flight you can Hold down the AP Disconnect button(The Red one on the Sidestick) and you'll Takeover control from the other Sidestick until you release the button(Unless you hold it for Longer than 40 Seconds) OR the Other persons who'm you've taken Priority from Presses down His AP Disconnect button. It's also associated with a Aural annunciation and Visual Warnings on the Glareshield. The only way to Go from Normal Law to Alternate Law in the 320 manually is to either turn off both of the FAC(Flight Augmentation Computer) or Turn off 2 of the 3 ADR's. Otherwise you can't go into Alternate Law without having Certain System Failures like Double Hydraulic Failure, Multiple Faulty Sensors, Unusual Attiude etc.

Thats cause you are Crazy, listen to yourself. You refuse to Fly yet you would board a colony ship to mars? lol

Yes thats refering to the Previous Flight where the Crew did Mange to figure out that they were having a Trim runaway and did the Correct thing. This is what the Crew on the Previous flight did whic is Also Part of the Memory Items. (Memory Items= Things that you NEED to know off your Memory without Looking at a Checklist)

There is a very easy way to Override it, Grasp and Hold the Trimwheel. Every Pilot that does a TR atleast on the 320 Fammily needs to be able to Fly the plane undery any Conditions in Alternate and Direct Law. Heck the Airbus Test Pilots have done landings on the A320 in Mechanical Revision Mode using only the THS and Rudder and they did it Fine. Refer to above with "Auto-Trim", it doesnt exist on the 737. Putting the Stabilizer Trim Cutout Switches to cutout DOES solve your Problem infront of you because MCAS wont be annoying you and trying to Trim Nose down. It doesn't matter if youre in Level,Climb or Descend. AFAIK the Lion Air 737 MAX's dont have the AOA indicators Options on the PFD(Almost no airline has the Option) So they couldn't have ever known whic AOA Sensor was faulty. The 737MAX's length that has been increased doesnt allow the plane to enter a stall Condition, Every flying object can Stall. the System is there to Help because in the past theres been Near Stall Incidents with the 73NG. Once they would have gotten Rid of MCAS they could've returned just Fine. I'm not saying its a difficult situation but it would've been Doable. They'd have the Stick shaker going on and from reading the Preliminary Report all their Instruments were fine. and even if they weren't. Back to the Basics, Pitch+Power

1. A single Faulty AOA Vane is not a reason to Ground a Fleet of a plane, Planes have this thing called MEL "Minimum Equipment List" whic specifies what is required on the Absoloute Minimum. Planes can be dispatched with alot of Stuff Inoperative and its still Fine 2. There is no Difference, Both flights had the exact same Fault(AOA Vane showing Indications whic are too High). The difference being 1 Crew managed to Cope with the Fault and the other one failed to follow the Stabilizer Trim Runaway Checklist 3. They all had to atleast be Trained for a Stabilizer Runaway Event whic is more dangerous than MCAS Thinking the planes Stalling 4. Because they've Flushed the Pitot Tubes, did additional Tests and they turned out fine so they cleared it again. If there is Something wrong you Divert, it doesnt matter if your Passengers are going to be Pissed. Atleast thats the way it is with most Western Airlines (EasyJet,Lufthansa,Ryanair,KLM etc.). No Pilot can get Fired for Pre-Cautiously Diverting. The Captains ALT and SPD indications weren't working on the Previous flight so they Switched the Captains PFD to source its info from the Right hand Pitot-Static port and they continued the Failure and wrote it up after landing. Oh and you can land a Plane with 2 Things only btw. Pitch+Power, the plane wouldnt have "ended up in aland-based crash" thats completly wrong. The QRH gives you Pitch and Thrust Values for a Given weight whic you can use to land your Plane if you had No Speed and Altittude indication on all 3 Displays. The "Stick"(btw. it's called a Yoke not a stick, there is no such thing as a Stick in a 737) doesn't bring the plane in a nosedive, the Pilots can ALWAYS counter it. and Yes there are 3 Ways to Counterract it really Simply. 1st way, use your Rocker Switches on the yoke to Trim Nose Up (against the Nose Down input from MCAS) whic will also inhibit any Trim Operation wether that is from MCAS or from the STS(Speed Trim System) for 5 Seconds before they start working again, 2. Way is to use the Stabilizer Cutout Switches witch the Crew on the Previous flight have correctly Done. and the 3. Way whic is also the easist is to Just Grab your Trimwheel. The Trimwheel is Mechanically Connected to the Gearbox of the THS via a Steel Cable. If you hold the Trimwheel with your Hand(Whic doesn't require a Hulk to do) No electrical triminput will be able to Override it. That should also be your First thought if the Trim is doing something its not supposed to and you cant figure it out, just Grab it. What isn't found in the Manual is the Description of the MCAS System whic was operating. and what the Other Crew found and did was the NNC(Non-normal Checklist) of the QRH(Quick Reference Handbook) was the Stabilizer Trim Runaway Checklist, and EVERY Commercial Plane carries a Flight manual(called FCOM in most cases) And a QRH onboard. The Issue was written up by the FlightCrew on the Previous flight whic was Unreliable Airspeed and Alttitude. Maintenance have done the AMM Tasks and it was working fine again. However no AOA Fault was Reported hence MX didn't fix it. How should they fix something theyre not aware of? and the plane doesnt "Randomly" dive into the Ground, it happens for a Particular Reason. Stall a 737Max with no assistance from the SMYD,EFS and MCAS and then you'll be glad systems like these Exist. They Have, they made a Tech Log Entry and MX Looked at it, but no one knew the Problem was with the AOA Vane, everyone suspected a Malfuction with the ADR(Air Data Reference) Systems. You don't have to Find a Checklist, theres this thing whic we like to call Airmanship. Every Pilot needs to know all Memory Items of the Top off the Head. Unrealiable Airspeed? 4° Nose Up and 74% N1. Trim Runaway? Grasp and Hold the TrimWheel. Aeroperu 603? 2 Completly diffrent accidents whic dont even Resemble eachother. The Instruments on this flight were working(On the Previous flight the Captains Instruments were Showing unreliable Indications whic was looked at by MX before the Accident Flight) Really, your basing your opinion on ACI whic is a complete overdamatization of the Smallest Thing? Have you ever worked as a Aeronautical Engineer or do you know anyone that is one? No one "Carelessly" Fixes planes these Days. You have to exactly follow the AMM Tasks and get the Task signed off, you cant just go to a plane and do something and call it a job done, Goodluck with that. What is your Claim of Understaffing and pressure based on? Do you have any Graphs, Data or Anything at all to back that claim up, or just ACI? 2 Crews Faced with the Same Situation, 1 Crew were able to Handle the Issue, the other weren't. Go Figure. A Single Human error doesnt cause a Crash, its a Chain of errors and also down to the Skill of a Person. I'm sorry to say but so many People are Pilots because they have the money when in reality they shouldn't even be allowed to touch something. Every Plane is objected to Multiple Maintenace Checks like C/D-Checks where its Torn appart and Every Inch is inspected. Those inspections dont happen randomly, They happen after xxxx Hours and Every airline keeps track of that. so a Plane going in for Maintenance Checks does not Cause a delay at all cause it's planned. 99% of the Cases theres always a Backup plane that can be flown in from somewhere or it's standing around at the airport to replace the "Faulty" one its not as big of a deal as you make it out to be. And no plane get's grounded for "minor" issue, if there is one, it's written up in the Tech Log and fixed on the next annual Check. it doesnt cause a delay and there is no reason to not tell of something thats faulty. I can tell you that The major western airlines dont Skimp their Maintenance, there is almost no Grey area, If you see that something is Broken you consult the AMM and to the Task in there, no matter what. Again this is so wrong. The Previous Crew wasn't aware of the MCAS system, they had however Unreliable SPD and ALT on the Cpt. Side, so they thought the Trim Runaway was because of that whic they have Reported to Maintenance. Maintenance Flushed the ADM's (Air Data Modules) and the Cpt. Pitot Tube, did Tests whic Worked Ok and they cleared the Plane. No one was even suspecting a faulty AOA Vane. I'm sorry but it doesnt Take a genius to look Realize that you need to Pull back more and More to maintain the Pitch attitude, give it some NU Trim to ease of the Yoke Forces only to feel the Nose wanting to go down again. You'd look down on the Trimwheel and see it Run away from you(Whic btw. on the 737 is Loud). Whic is what the Crew on the Previous Flight managed to do. Except that the Upsets in QF72 happened within Seconds and caused Abrupt sharp movements. Because of a Faulty AOA sensor Liekly, but theres more to it than Just shifting the blame to the Pilots. There is no "Auto-Trim" on a 737, you have MCAS(Only on the MAX) and the STS(Speed Trim System). Also this Cut off Switch as you've been Refering to (Proper name is: Stabilizer Trim Cutout Switches, of whic there are Always 2, one for the Main Electrical Channel and one for the Autopilot Channel) has been in the 737 since the Very first 737, if you were only fammiliar with legacy 737s then you would Exactly know where your 2 Cutout switches are. Wherever you got that Info From, its complete BS. The Stabilizer Cutout Switches and their Function are also Mentioned in the FCOM(Flight Crew Operating Manual) Whic every pilot will atleast have seen when they do their TypeRating. They had the Time, the crew before them Managed to stop the Runaway.

If i opt out will this Delete my Discord account/Can i send that email without having my account Suspended/Deleted/Inaccesible?

This is 10/10

I don't Care about the "Reduced" Graphics, looks good enough to me and if the Game itself is fantastic then i'll gladly take the trade off Rather than having a shity AAA tittle whic looks good

Gotcha, kinda seemed like you were "Attacking" him so to say, seems like we had a Double-Missunderstanding

I Like the Motherboard Design but the LED's are Kinda meh, i guess it's good for People who want to match their pc with their room

What do the Rip-Offs and Low Quality Products in China have anything to do with the Other guy you wrote your "Seems Fitting" Comment too? Like what was the reason behind it?

I Like the Design of the new Logo, they could maybe Change the Color to something diffrent than Yellow, but other Than that it looks very good.