Isocadia

Jesus, don't these people understand how variables work?
 
For a consistent result they must keep all variables the same across all tests. This moron changed just about every single thing he could, different cooler? Check. Different clock speed? Check. Different voltage? Check.
 
He might as well say green is better than purple because my bacon tastes of sunshine.

The dot (star if you're replied to the topic) next to the topic title will take you to the first unread post if you click it.

Okay, i was mistaken. The G3258 does not make up 1% of Pentiums. It makes up 0.005952% of all Pentiums. After all, there are 168 different models. Also, if you read the context of my sentence, you would know I was speaking literally when i said "99% of pentiums are not the G3258". I have no idea how I could have made that more obvious, without including a crude drawing to go with it. Now that we've gotten the math out of the way, lets address the rest of your wall of text and get down to the bottom of why you are wrong.
 
First of all, I am not a liar. My use of the word "redefine" is 100% correct, as I paired them with "market segments". You said the G3258 changed the Pentium's market. Does that not fall in line with my use of the statement "redefined its market segment"?
 
    Oh, and let me pick out this hilarious part of your wall of text.   
This is the most absurd claim i've seen in a while. For something to change the market, it means the change must hold for future generations. Hence the word "change". It changed nothing. The Pentiums that immediately followed it, were locked down exactly like the ones that came before it. No change was made. 
 
Also, you have completely confused "Special Edition" and "Limited Edition". Perhaps that is why it has yet to sink in that this G3258 is not a normal pentium, and does not speak for all pentiums when one uses the term "pentium". "All pentium's are gaming CPU's, ESPECIALLY the G3258". Yeah, and my Athlon 2400+ is still a gaming CPU because it can play a 10 year old MMO. 
 
Face it friend. You generalized all Pentiums because of a single overclockable pentium. You have clearly never owned one, and yet you argue with a man that has owned not one, but TWO overclocked Pentiums, both of which failed to play some of the latest AAA titles. 
 
As for the GT 730, how is my logic flawed? I said it is marketed as a multimedia card. Nvidia's Official website lists it as such. Same with EVGA and MSI. I included the "3x the performance of integrated graphics" bit, because it was also included. The price of a product has nothing to do with its intended purpose. By your logic, there is no reason for the Titan X to cost $1000 because its just a gaming card. It lacks the raw compute power that the Kepler Tesla's/Titan's had to be anything else. 
 
"I provided outdated information from one source that the game runs fine". Let me show you how things are going down AFTER the patches that broke dual cores forever in GTA 5. Oh, and don't just say "don't patch it then" because then you can't play it online. 
 

 

 
Plenty more video's, just don't want to flood this wall of text with them. I've even tried every fix listed in all of those videos, which is mostly videos about Nvidia's frame skipping, or creating an ini file to disable HT, or "use high priority on the game and close the rockstar launcher after opening the client". None of it worked.
 
You keep saying the G3258 is a gaming CPU. I'll be over here knowing it is not, seeing as I have actually used one. Actually, i used a Pentium that was better than the G3258 in every single aspect, and it was not enough to make Elder Scrolls Online a smooth experience. My little brother complained about his 4.2ghz on the latest WoW patch. So even for MMO's, the Pentium is starting to lose it's appeal. 
 
In summary: I am right. It is pointless for Intel to add stronger iGPU to a Pentium, when the Pentium itself is the bottleneck, not the iGPU. Before you try to run this argument into the ground, i suggest you actually go out and buy a G3258 so you can at least have some experience to draw from.

you could try returning it to them /s
http://azerty.nl/

The shop I work at does it the other way around. You sign a waiver stating the shop isn't responsible for the data. You either have to backup the data yourself or pay to have a backup made.

The shop I work at does it the other way around. You sign a waiver stating the shop isn't responsible for the data. You either have to backup the data yourself or pay to have a backup made.

well...   Mass Effect jump from the "Unreal Engine" line to "Frostbite 3"   Mirror's Edge jump from the "Unreal Engine" line to "Frostbite 3"     and... "Batman Arkham Knight" (that is Unreal Engine 3)   is the game that has been removed from Steam for the "bad" work on pc   so... i disagree on that      "Frostbite 3" is way better than Unreal Engine this days (for me at least)

You have to order it, it is not always available ( think birth, accident not serious enough for ambulance but still a quick run to the hospital is needed ) A taxi is a lot more expensive, having to pay a driver who has to feed his family and pay his house etc.
A world where all cars are self driving is a lot safer than where only taxi drivers are present, atleast in the Netherlands where taxi drivers are total assholes and dangerous.

You have to order it, it is not always available ( think birth, accident not serious enough for ambulance but still a quick run to the hospital is needed ) A taxi is a lot more expensive, having to pay a driver who has to feed his family and pay his house etc.
A world where all cars are self driving is a lot safer than where only taxi drivers are present, atleast in the Netherlands where taxi drivers are total assholes and dangerous.

You have to order it, it is not always available ( think birth, accident not serious enough for ambulance but still a quick run to the hospital is needed ) A taxi is a lot more expensive, having to pay a driver who has to feed his family and pay his house etc.
A world where all cars are self driving is a lot safer than where only taxi drivers are present, atleast in the Netherlands where taxi drivers are total assholes and dangerous.

Then you should be clear next time. You stated that if you want to do fuck all instead of driving, you should take the bus. The reply was a bus can't take you anywhere, and you replied a taxi can. When stated that a taxi isn't a solution you were unable to figure out why and asked why not, to which I gave a few examples. With these statements you are implying that a self driving car isn't the solution to people who don't always want to drive themselves ( the if you want to do fuck all, don't drive ) and that you thought that a taxi and the bus is the solution to people who don't want to drive.I don't agree and believe that all cars should be self driving and manual driving shouldn't be allowed on highways etc. and that if you want to drive a car, you should either go to places like national parks where there isn't a lot of traffic or to race tracks to enjoy driving as hobby.

You have to order it, it is not always available ( think birth, accident not serious enough for ambulance but still a quick run to the hospital is needed ) A taxi is a lot more expensive, having to pay a driver who has to feed his family and pay his house etc.
A world where all cars are self driving is a lot safer than where only taxi drivers are present, atleast in the Netherlands where taxi drivers are total assholes and dangerous.

Then you should be clear next time. You stated that if you want to do fuck all instead of driving, you should take the bus. The reply was a bus can't take you anywhere, and you replied a taxi can. When stated that a taxi isn't a solution you were unable to figure out why and asked why not, to which I gave a few examples. With these statements you are implying that a self driving car isn't the solution to people who don't always want to drive themselves ( the if you want to do fuck all, don't drive ) and that you thought that a taxi and the bus is the solution to people who don't want to drive.I don't agree and believe that all cars should be self driving and manual driving shouldn't be allowed on highways etc. and that if you want to drive a car, you should either go to places like national parks where there isn't a lot of traffic or to race tracks to enjoy driving as hobby.

You have to order it, it is not always available ( think birth, accident not serious enough for ambulance but still a quick run to the hospital is needed ) A taxi is a lot more expensive, having to pay a driver who has to feed his family and pay his house etc.
A world where all cars are self driving is a lot safer than where only taxi drivers are present, atleast in the Netherlands where taxi drivers are total assholes and dangerous.

You have to order it, it is not always available ( think birth, accident not serious enough for ambulance but still a quick run to the hospital is needed ) A taxi is a lot more expensive, having to pay a driver who has to feed his family and pay his house etc.
A world where all cars are self driving is a lot safer than where only taxi drivers are present, atleast in the Netherlands where taxi drivers are total assholes and dangerous.

Then you should be clear next time. You stated that if you want to do fuck all instead of driving, you should take the bus. The reply was a bus can't take you anywhere, and you replied a taxi can. When stated that a taxi isn't a solution you were unable to figure out why and asked why not, to which I gave a few examples. With these statements you are implying that a self driving car isn't the solution to people who don't always want to drive themselves ( the if you want to do fuck all, don't drive ) and that you thought that a taxi and the bus is the solution to people who don't want to drive.I don't agree and believe that all cars should be self driving and manual driving shouldn't be allowed on highways etc. and that if you want to drive a car, you should either go to places like national parks where there isn't a lot of traffic or to race tracks to enjoy driving as hobby.

You have to order it, it is not always available ( think birth, accident not serious enough for ambulance but still a quick run to the hospital is needed ) A taxi is a lot more expensive, having to pay a driver who has to feed his family and pay his house etc.
A world where all cars are self driving is a lot safer than where only taxi drivers are present, atleast in the Netherlands where taxi drivers are total assholes and dangerous.

You have to order it, it is not always available ( think birth, accident not serious enough for ambulance but still a quick run to the hospital is needed ) A taxi is a lot more expensive, having to pay a driver who has to feed his family and pay his house etc.
A world where all cars are self driving is a lot safer than where only taxi drivers are present, atleast in the Netherlands where taxi drivers are total assholes and dangerous.

Then you should be clear next time. You stated that if you want to do fuck all instead of driving, you should take the bus. The reply was a bus can't take you anywhere, and you replied a taxi can. When stated that a taxi isn't a solution you were unable to figure out why and asked why not, to which I gave a few examples. With these statements you are implying that a self driving car isn't the solution to people who don't always want to drive themselves ( the if you want to do fuck all, don't drive ) and that you thought that a taxi and the bus is the solution to people who don't want to drive.I don't agree and believe that all cars should be self driving and manual driving shouldn't be allowed on highways etc. and that if you want to drive a car, you should either go to places like national parks where there isn't a lot of traffic or to race tracks to enjoy driving as hobby.

You have to order it, it is not always available ( think birth, accident not serious enough for ambulance but still a quick run to the hospital is needed ) A taxi is a lot more expensive, having to pay a driver who has to feed his family and pay his house etc.
A world where all cars are self driving is a lot safer than where only taxi drivers are present, atleast in the Netherlands where taxi drivers are total assholes and dangerous.

You have to order it, it is not always available ( think birth, accident not serious enough for ambulance but still a quick run to the hospital is needed ) A taxi is a lot more expensive, having to pay a driver who has to feed his family and pay his house etc.
A world where all cars are self driving is a lot safer than where only taxi drivers are present, atleast in the Netherlands where taxi drivers are total assholes and dangerous.

Gorilla glass is 6-6.5?
Unfortunatly for you, quartz is 7/7.5, and since quartz is a major component of sand, I wouldn't be so sure about them hard items you are having encounters with ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
But on a serious note, Gorilla Glass gets rekt by sand and I've seen phones full of micro-scratches due to it ( live at the coast in the Netherland, so lots of sand here )

So if I want to play Pokemon Yellow I should go out and buy a second hand gameboy and a second hand pokemon yellow cartridge where none of the money payed goes to the original creator? How is that different from downloading the ROM and playing it on an emulator?
I'm not trying to be any kind of flame-war starter, and to be clear I disapprove of piracy, but by that logic all second hand selling of games should be forbidden, something which everyone was complaining about with the new DRM key based always online kinds of DRM. The issue with piracy is that you are not taking anything from the creator, except for supposed lost sales but you can't exactly prove that they would have bought the game if piracy wasn't available.
Just think about this example:
I used to be able to go to the store and buy a game. This game required me to insert the disk when I wanted to play the game. I hated this so I made a virtual disk which I could mount so I wouldn't have to locate the disk.
I'm gonna assume that this is not what you consider piracy. I am making a copy for my personal use.
Now, my friend wants to try said game, so I lend him the CD, he installs it and using the CD to play the game.
Still assuming you agree, I don't think it is bad to be able to loan people the stuff you own, since I am also able to loan out my car etc. to other people.
Now, I forget he has the CD, I use my virtual disk I made and he uses my CD. Where did things become morally wrong, since basically what has happened is I have allowed someone to download the game. Was my original copy morally wrong? This would force me to rebuy the game every time the cd would get lost or damaged, which to me sounds very strange.
Was me lending out the cd morally wrong? This would mean that lending out a car or a shovel is also morally wrong.
Now apply this to a bigger scale scenario, where he makes a copy and lends the CD to someone else etc. This would be what we call piracy, yet I fail to see which precise step in the process makes the event morally wrong.
Just to make things clear again, I am against piracy, but calling people who pirate all kinds of names I do not agree with. The entirety of piracy happening could be called morally wrong, but I don't think you are able to call the individual person morally wrong based on the action.
TL;DR:
People who pirate aren't morally wrong, but piracy is. You shouldn't call people who pirate names or whatever, but you should instead focus on the process as a whole and how to stop that from happening.

Unless you are like me and will want to walk up to a wall with a 4k VR design and still not see a single pixel.
Honestly, I don't get why people are mad at SC for setting their standard in advance of what current hardware is capable of driving. Making a texture at 1080p or at 4k probably doesn't make an enormous difference (sure there will be some) in the time it takes to make it, so why not make it 4k and give the option.
Alot of people were mad at Bethesda for not including high resolution textures with skyrim and people are mass installing 4k texture packs, yet when a company does supply the 4k textures now you are saying they shouldn't?

Seeing these demo's I always wonder, when are they going to be able to render dirty, greasy hair and having it look realistic. All these demo's always feature hair from shampoo commercials and I'll be damned if my hair looks like that even 10 seconds after having washed it....