MasterRaceFanBoy

Go for apple whatever you do.. their OS is just made to run 3years witouth a need to restart and 0 problems!! and so on, but there are some windows laptops as well which are expensive and ..good. 1. MacBook Pro 2. Dell XPS15 3. Asus N550JX

I've been using mpc-hc since Noah's era.. so

hmm interesting! for me is just a gorgeous crazy pc case. Mac's have intel and amd parts in it, people shold not bitch the amd fanboys for this. I honestly dont care is from amd. lian li or whatever. It's just a cool case. I wonder if they can work it up more in to the future and se a 32cores in there.

window is just full of bugs and it slows down badly soo badly with time.. OXS all the way for productivity!

That is true, didn´t noticed there is 2x4, either way you should get an nhd14-15 or cryorig r1 or just anthing better than the outdated 212evo

Pretty good, but get a better cooler and more ram.

Zenofone 2 or a moto g 3rd gen

I would say, stick with the n970 if you like nVidia, but I would spend few more $ and get an xeon e3-1220 v3, is like $15 $20 more, with a bit higer clock and more MB L3 cache which would do a bit better in your work also every day use.

And what does it means? That AMDs 4yo gpu, still beats an 2015 very new nvidias gpu?

I still belive that most of te people still buy a 1080 or 1440 monitor which we will all be hanppy to have a 970/ 290 i dont care if ppl are dissapointed.. They should start and look at nvidia for a second and scream for lower price! No1 cares of paying $7 a year less with a gtx but too many cares to see just 3 to 8 fps more in a game and for that we should pay $100/200 more.

nah.. I don't really think so. Is true we've reached ipv4 limit some years ago but about an ending? There can be some logic facts such as an ww3 or A. I that can take Internet to an ending for a period of time.

Obviously everyone knows the ppc between these 2 companies, AMD more cores and weaker, intel less but stronger. Intel i5 will perform better than amd fx in older games that require few cores(2) or even single threading. In newer games(bf4, crysis 3 etc..) also the future, amd fx it's perfect because due to games will be using multi threading. As always.. The diference comes at what do you use your pc for. Obviously in low budget fx wins in any possible ways and you save money for a highend gpu. Because for most parts in current games the difference will be made by the GPU. Now all should look this way, have a GREAT GPU+"worse" cpu rather than GREAT CPU+ mid, lowend gpu. Poeople should know and stop giving advices from online benchmarks. The are milions of gamers that use an fx over an i5, you just can do more with "8 core" you can expand more.

a gtx 970 would be perfect, but there are some quadros as well. i'll look around..

I hope nvidia will never do such thing. #sarcasm?

If you want all on ultra, uber mods plus 2-3-4k res moded go for r9 290x 8gb. Then there is n980, and just for simple 1080 ultra r280x, r9 290, n960, n970 are just ok. (will play tons of games on ultra) If you have free hand on the budget ofc you can go SLI - crossF or dual gpu. But right now I would pick an r9 290x 4/8gb over n970 just because of being capable using all 4GB.. I like adding some mods in any game.