atomicmonkey101

7 year old screenshots? Meh...
 
Compared to fan made Half-Life 2 in Unreal...
 

Well i whitelist places like LTT and certain modding forums, but the big reason why i have adblock on is pretty much this.
 
*opens up website* oh this seems pretty rad *plays video*
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! *DRAMATIC SUPER LOUD INCREASED VOLUME NOISE* COOOOOOOOOOMEEEEEEEE SEEEEEEE THIS MOOOOOOOOVIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! @ 9000000000000000000000000000000% VOLUME.
 
And for a kid with aspergers like me, that type of crap can really stun you pretty hard, and for anyone else with hearing sensitivity. and also there was an advert on youtube i heard was pretty bad for people with anxiety issues too (something to do with a horror movie) and i think it probably was pulled down because of complaints.
 
I don't mind having commercials on a site as long as they are responsible about it.
Like not covering up about 50% of the webpage, or Playing EXTREMELY LOUDLY or Suddenly, Plus good commercials can always add a bit of nice aesthetic.
 
Like i have a gigabyte z170 board commercial under this post. and i have to admit with the night theme on it looks pretty neat . commercials should be done like that, good enough that it draws you to them, instead of them throwing themselves at your face

scrolling through the comments and reading all the piracy people kicking up a fuss. hilarious. Windows 10 here I come.

...and all the pirates will be revealed, lol. Serves 'em right.

The only mods I would pay for would be mods that have been quality controlled by bethesda/valve and are worth the money. Sorry I am not paying $5 for a suit of armor. So basically quest mods only. And the split would have to be correct as well. Mod maker getting at least 50%.

and maybe one thats not 400% broken

And we let this country be a superpower why?

One could argue that those are not, technically, reasons to not buy the game. (unless you have some kind of insatiable desire to play space battles in the new game and if they arent included you will explode)  Thats a chart cross examining feature sets in the game. While yes, the new Battlefront does not include a lot of the great things that made Battlefront 2 such a great game, that does not mean that Battlefront will be bad.
 
Nobody except the devs have played the game and the public has not even seen gameplay. We have ZERO idea of what the game will be like. Maybe it will blow everyone's socks off and receive 10/10 reviews despite not having those things. (although I doubt it)
 
My point is that I think everybody needs to slow the heck down and stop screaming about how there are no space battles, campaign, instant action, ect. I think it is really unfortunate that those things aren't included in the game, but, until we have played the game when its released, then we will have 'reasons' not to buy the game. It is possible for the game to be good without them. Look at Republic Commando (I know it is a diff style of game) not really any of those features, (space battles, vehicle combat, etc) but it was still one of the best games of all time. IMHO .
 
I don't have anything against you or the chart, it is really interesting to see the differences. However, Im pretty sure that they have said that they are taking a different approach to the game from BF2 and maybe thats a good thing. Anyways, maybe some of the features lacking from battlefront 2 will be added via DLC (free hopefully).
 
Whatever..... this is just my thoughts on the whole situation right now.

One could argue that those are not, technically, reasons to not buy the game. (unless you have some kind of insatiable desire to play space battles in the new game and if they arent included you will explode)  Thats a chart cross examining feature sets in the game. While yes, the new Battlefront does not include a lot of the great things that made Battlefront 2 such a great game, that does not mean that Battlefront will be bad.
 
Nobody except the devs have played the game and the public has not even seen gameplay. We have ZERO idea of what the game will be like. Maybe it will blow everyone's socks off and receive 10/10 reviews despite not having those things. (although I doubt it)
 
My point is that I think everybody needs to slow the heck down and stop screaming about how there are no space battles, campaign, instant action, ect. I think it is really unfortunate that those things aren't included in the game, but, until we have played the game when its released, then we will have 'reasons' not to buy the game. It is possible for the game to be good without them. Look at Republic Commando (I know it is a diff style of game) not really any of those features, (space battles, vehicle combat, etc) but it was still one of the best games of all time. IMHO .
 
I don't have anything against you or the chart, it is really interesting to see the differences. However, Im pretty sure that they have said that they are taking a different approach to the game from BF2 and maybe thats a good thing. Anyways, maybe some of the features lacking from battlefront 2 will be added via DLC (free hopefully).
 
Whatever..... this is just my thoughts on the whole situation right now.

One could argue that those are not, technically, reasons to not buy the game. (unless you have some kind of insatiable desire to play space battles in the new game and if they arent included you will explode)  Thats a chart cross examining feature sets in the game. While yes, the new Battlefront does not include a lot of the great things that made Battlefront 2 such a great game, that does not mean that Battlefront will be bad.
 
Nobody except the devs have played the game and the public has not even seen gameplay. We have ZERO idea of what the game will be like. Maybe it will blow everyone's socks off and receive 10/10 reviews despite not having those things. (although I doubt it)
 
My point is that I think everybody needs to slow the heck down and stop screaming about how there are no space battles, campaign, instant action, ect. I think it is really unfortunate that those things aren't included in the game, but, until we have played the game when its released, then we will have 'reasons' not to buy the game. It is possible for the game to be good without them. Look at Republic Commando (I know it is a diff style of game) not really any of those features, (space battles, vehicle combat, etc) but it was still one of the best games of all time. IMHO .
 
I don't have anything against you or the chart, it is really interesting to see the differences. However, Im pretty sure that they have said that they are taking a different approach to the game from BF2 and maybe thats a good thing. Anyways, maybe some of the features lacking from battlefront 2 will be added via DLC (free hopefully).
 
Whatever..... this is just my thoughts on the whole situation right now.

One could argue that those are not, technically, reasons to not buy the game. (unless you have some kind of insatiable desire to play space battles in the new game and if they arent included you will explode)  Thats a chart cross examining feature sets in the game. While yes, the new Battlefront does not include a lot of the great things that made Battlefront 2 such a great game, that does not mean that Battlefront will be bad.
 
Nobody except the devs have played the game and the public has not even seen gameplay. We have ZERO idea of what the game will be like. Maybe it will blow everyone's socks off and receive 10/10 reviews despite not having those things. (although I doubt it)
 
My point is that I think everybody needs to slow the heck down and stop screaming about how there are no space battles, campaign, instant action, ect. I think it is really unfortunate that those things aren't included in the game, but, until we have played the game when its released, then we will have 'reasons' not to buy the game. It is possible for the game to be good without them. Look at Republic Commando (I know it is a diff style of game) not really any of those features, (space battles, vehicle combat, etc) but it was still one of the best games of all time. IMHO .
 
I don't have anything against you or the chart, it is really interesting to see the differences. However, Im pretty sure that they have said that they are taking a different approach to the game from BF2 and maybe thats a good thing. Anyways, maybe some of the features lacking from battlefront 2 will be added via DLC (free hopefully).
 
Whatever..... this is just my thoughts on the whole situation right now.

One could argue that those are not, technically, reasons to not buy the game. (unless you have some kind of insatiable desire to play space battles in the new game and if they arent included you will explode)  Thats a chart cross examining feature sets in the game. While yes, the new Battlefront does not include a lot of the great things that made Battlefront 2 such a great game, that does not mean that Battlefront will be bad.
 
Nobody except the devs have played the game and the public has not even seen gameplay. We have ZERO idea of what the game will be like. Maybe it will blow everyone's socks off and receive 10/10 reviews despite not having those things. (although I doubt it)
 
My point is that I think everybody needs to slow the heck down and stop screaming about how there are no space battles, campaign, instant action, ect. I think it is really unfortunate that those things aren't included in the game, but, until we have played the game when its released, then we will have 'reasons' not to buy the game. It is possible for the game to be good without them. Look at Republic Commando (I know it is a diff style of game) not really any of those features, (space battles, vehicle combat, etc) but it was still one of the best games of all time. IMHO .
 
I don't have anything against you or the chart, it is really interesting to see the differences. However, Im pretty sure that they have said that they are taking a different approach to the game from BF2 and maybe thats a good thing. Anyways, maybe some of the features lacking from battlefront 2 will be added via DLC (free hopefully).
 
Whatever..... this is just my thoughts on the whole situation right now.

One could argue that those are not, technically, reasons to not buy the game. (unless you have some kind of insatiable desire to play space battles in the new game and if they arent included you will explode)  Thats a chart cross examining feature sets in the game. While yes, the new Battlefront does not include a lot of the great things that made Battlefront 2 such a great game, that does not mean that Battlefront will be bad.
 
Nobody except the devs have played the game and the public has not even seen gameplay. We have ZERO idea of what the game will be like. Maybe it will blow everyone's socks off and receive 10/10 reviews despite not having those things. (although I doubt it)
 
My point is that I think everybody needs to slow the heck down and stop screaming about how there are no space battles, campaign, instant action, ect. I think it is really unfortunate that those things aren't included in the game, but, until we have played the game when its released, then we will have 'reasons' not to buy the game. It is possible for the game to be good without them. Look at Republic Commando (I know it is a diff style of game) not really any of those features, (space battles, vehicle combat, etc) but it was still one of the best games of all time. IMHO .
 
I don't have anything against you or the chart, it is really interesting to see the differences. However, Im pretty sure that they have said that they are taking a different approach to the game from BF2 and maybe thats a good thing. Anyways, maybe some of the features lacking from battlefront 2 will be added via DLC (free hopefully).
 
Whatever..... this is just my thoughts on the whole situation right now.

It's perfectly fine. As long as it fits and works, it is pretty much for sure going to be thick enough gauge wire. Even a lamp cord could run an i5+270.

haha yes. if the stars align.....

I am on your side too, piracy makes me feel sick

i see. I dont want to argue, so many people on this forum are just looking for a fight, but I will ask you this:does wanting something justifies stealing?

i see. I dont want to argue, so many people on this forum are just looking for a fight, but I will ask you this:does wanting something justifies stealing?

this explains everything...

Yeah i see what you mean. just remember though, a massive part of halo, just like quake, is map control. but obviously in a different style of gameplay.

actually I am not exaggerating. I think that you could fit an atx system in there. bit of a tight fit maybe, but still I think it wouldnt be too difficult.

my gosh...

Yeah i see what you mean. just remember though, a massive part of halo, just like quake, is map control. but obviously in a different style of gameplay.

now THAT is a broad generalization. id say a good 70% of the CoDs are good.

it is. Im completely happy with my O-Xbox 480p. whats the big deal?
 
Dont worry, Im not completely stupid, I like high res pc gaming but Im more than happy with the O-Xbox. So in a way, it is just a number.