duriel

i'd suck a mean dick for another shipment of em

i said suck a mean dick, not take it up the pooper
 
;-;

wow i'm dumb and can't read lmao

something like this? search gpu diagrams like gtx 980ti or fury x

k a few things
 
1) PCBs of computer components are not double sided, they usually have 5-10 layers
even if there are no traces on the surface there will pretty much always be some underneath
 
2) the card was 100% dead the moment you drilled that hole, there is no way to repair that kind of damage
everyone saying it could be repaired is wrong
 
3) putting the screwdriver in there was quite dangerous, you could have killed your motherboard or CPU too
 
4) snapping the card in half just prevents someone from putting a nice GPU on their wall
the card was impossible to repair in the first place, so snapping it cant make it worse
 
5) make a keychain out of the GPU die?  I see people doing it with CPUs but not GPUs

No, it isn't. http://io9.com/the-glass-is-a-liquid-myth-has-finally-been-destroyed-496190894

modify element, print + bring to a store and try to get an older employee, chances are they'll match it for you without issue

if this was true why would amd outright say the fury x is an overclockers dream
 
don't be ignorant lol

If these are true it looks like 4GB HBM is plenty up to 4K which is the highest resolution anyone will realistically use for gaming for a while.
Even then, HBM2 8GB will remove basically all memory limitations as it looks like 4GB HBM matches 12GB GDDR5 up to that petering off point at 5K.
 
seems believable i guess

this
it would be absolutely foolish to release an entire brand new r9 300 series line on the 28nm process when nvidia already did this about 9 months ago, which was *still* pretty silly considering how old 28nm is going to be by next gen's release
 
amd wasting all the money they don't have on new cards for the 300 lineup is a bad idea, we & amd know nobody is happy with the rebranding right now, but it's for the best.
 
my money is on 400 series being an entire new lineup on a new node, with Zen being released etc.
 
amd knows what they're doing.

this
it would be absolutely foolish to release an entire brand new r9 300 series line on the 28nm process when nvidia already did this about 9 months ago, which was *still* pretty silly considering how old 28nm is going to be by next gen's release
 
amd wasting all the money they don't have on new cards for the 300 lineup is a bad idea, we & amd know nobody is happy with the rebranding right now, but it's for the best.
 
my money is on 400 series being an entire new lineup on a new node, with Zen being released etc.
 
amd knows what they're doing.

what? within 1% distance between nvidia's highest end card while taking a huge risk on hbm, and you're managing to be disappointed?
 
oooookay
 
   
>Has a GTX 760
 
top kek

what? within 1% distance between nvidia's highest end card while taking a huge risk on hbm, and you're managing to be disappointed?
 
oooookay
 
   
>Has a GTX 760
 
top kek

what? within 1% distance between nvidia's highest end card while taking a huge risk on hbm, and you're managing to be disappointed?
 
oooookay
 
   
>Has a GTX 760
 
top kek

what? within 1% distance between nvidia's highest end card while taking a huge risk on hbm, and you're managing to be disappointed?
 
oooookay
 
   
>Has a GTX 760
 
top kek

what are you even saying
 
are you actually comparing hbm to gddr5 and saying amd had to move to hbm to beat nvidia?
 
lol.

what? within 1% distance between nvidia's highest end card while taking a huge risk on hbm, and you're managing to be disappointed?
 
oooookay
 
   
>Has a GTX 760
 
top kek

what? within 1% distance between nvidia's highest end card while taking a huge risk on hbm, and you're managing to be disappointed?
 
oooookay
 
   
>Has a GTX 760
 
top kek

what? within 1% distance between nvidia's highest end card while taking a huge risk on hbm, and you're managing to be disappointed?
 
oooookay
 
   
>Has a GTX 760
 
top kek

what? within 1% distance between nvidia's highest end card while taking a huge risk on hbm, and you're managing to be disappointed?
 
oooookay
 
   
>Has a GTX 760
 
top kek

i think it's funny all the pirates in this thread are complaining when in reality you're getting phenomenal internet+phone+tv service for 1/3 the price of what other companies charge
why not put your savings towards actually buying products lol
 
or you know, use a vpn. i'd assume most pirates are smart enough to do this but i guess not.
 
sigh. so much dumb in this thread.

http://au.pcpartpicker.com/part/asrock-motherboard-z97extreme6

AMD kabini ???

fun
 
 
 
good first option
 
 
 
non-soc
 
 
 
pass
 
 
 
it'd end up throttling too hard, but is theoretically possible. keep two cores enabled, ht off, low voltage + 1ghz clock speed~?

exciting news. hope skylake lives up to the hype
 
if not, i'm going to even more content with my recent 4790k purchase esp. with how beast it's been overclocking lately.

Source: http://diy.pconline.com.cn/637/6375701.html
 
Well it looks like Skylake is Due Q3 2015 (Between July and September), while Broadwell will be launching soon in Q2 (at least by June). Kind of interesting that they chose to launch Broadwell in Q2 and then a quarter later launch Skylake. Not really understanding the point of that to be honest, but I believe it had to do with Intel being behind on 14nm process. The i7-5775C, is the 4C/8T 4790k equivalent while the i5-5675C is the 4C/4T 4690k equivalent both unlocked and overclockable. Then a few months later Skylake launches with the 6700k and the 6600k. The 6700k being the 4790k equivalent while the 6600k being the 4690k equivalent. Broadwell was supposed to just be a die shrink, and usually we expect 5-10% IPC performance increases from that (tick). Then here almost a few months later Skylake will launch with at least another 10-15% IPC performance increase, and is supposedly completely redesigned (tock) so we could see even higher than 15% IPC increases but I wouldn't hold your breath on that one. All in all looks like Skylake will definitely Coexist with Broadwell as stated in previous leaked rumors. But, in the end, Skylake could offer at minimum a 15% improvement over Haswell considering we can expect at least 5% IPC increase from Broadwell and then another 10% from Skylake. Now this is bare minimum increase. We could see up to 10% from Broadwell, and another 10-15% from Skylake which could bring it closer to 20-25% increase in IPC compared to Haswell which at this point means if you are running Sandy Bridge or even pre-Sandy Bridge. You are looking at a nice gain in performance from moving to Skylake.