Jump to content

runit3

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,703

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by runit3

  1. runit3
    Is the DRAM voltage being adjusted to match the XMP specs? If it has try notching up the RAM voltage by .01-.02v and keying manually.
  2. runit3
    failed for what reasons? I haven't had any XMP issues with my OC Formula w/i3-6100 or the 6600k I do always manually key in my voltage values though.
  3. runit3
    Should throw that in the OP. That configuration makes much more sense in terms of being able to function. I am not learned enough in RAM operation to give a 100% statement, but if logic dictates anything I would assume the RAM calls are bank segregated to the matching kits, meaning there's no cross-addressing of operation between each kit (I would hope). Running AIDA's memory stress test and benchmark may be a good way to test full load saturation
  4. runit3
    So each kit listed is actually a pair of DIMM's within a separate bank? I assumed you had 1 stick of each, both operating within the same operation bank. This changes things a bit. If you're not throwing errors, and you have 4 DIMM's, 2 matched to each other, and you're not receiving any errors in Memtest, then fuck it -run it how you have them labeled in "unlinked'. Again, would be worth checking the implementation with CPU-Z.
  5. runit3
    The colors, THEY BURN You need to clarify the "linked" thing. Are you manually going in and changing tRCD for the Patriot kit? If they're in dual channel operation the Patriot kit should automatically be matching timings to the slower (Kingston) kit. You would need to confirm any manual adjustments with CPU-Z within the SPD tab. If you are manually setting the Patriot kit to run tRCD at 9, and you're not currently experiencing any hard memory faults, I would expect them eventually. If you're hell bent on defying all logic and reason manually set tRCD to 9 and run memtest overnight, I would be surprised if you weren't throwing errors from the manual miss-match.
  6. runit3
    What BIOS version are you running? Some early revision BIOS's had limited/poorly implemented XMP support (this goes for nearly all the manufacturers). I'd only run the BIOS update if you see more recent versions that specifically site memory/XMP support updates. This should be as simple as hitting the XMP drop-down menu and choosing your speed divider.
  7. runit3
    linked is an odd term to use. If you mean linked as dual channel operation with matching speeds, that would be the correct choice. You can run them separately in single channel operation with miss-matched latency, but the difference between tRCD 9/11 is so small there's no reason not to run them in dual channel. The benefits of dual channel operation outweigh the very small increase in latency for one primary timing. http://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/1349-ram-how-dual-channel-works-vs-single-channel/Page-3
  8. runit3
    Sorry, the OP is a bit unclear, but are you getting the BSOD while trying to install a new OS version of 64 bit Win 10? or you're getting the BSOD from a previous, already existing OS installation from media that was installed on another machine? If you're trying to do a fresh install re-create your installation media and completely format -delete all existing partitions, then format your drive.
  9. runit3
    I buy TUF boards for the warranty, not the looks. (glances at mix of sandy poo brown and gray armor) Last time I looked into getting the Gryphon armor kit it was something like 1/3 the cost of the board, which I just can't justify.
  10. runit3
    It is extremely unlikely that he would need any special board other than a Z series. I run my 4690k at 4.9 1.3625v on a Z97i-plus (ITX). This isn't FX from AMD, you don't need a true 6+ power phase board to get a decent OC. I'd pay the extra $10 as long as it's a boxed processor. Intel will not honor OEM chips for warranty support.
  11. runit3
    Under 85C for synthetic loads
  12. runit3
    yes, completely safe. I run mine at 1.465v, although I have Intel's PTPP, and IDC
  13. runit3
    yep
  14. runit3
    Overclocking via BCLK on any system can cause those problems that are described. On Haswell you're already pushing relative max BCLK (~105). I wouldn't push it any further. If you really wanted to OC get a K-SKU chip, you already have the Z87 board.
  15. runit3
    If you could provide me with a sample file for rendering and a link to whatever program you're using I'd be happy to run a test render and report the time. Could adjust -25% for the lower core/thread count, or just disable 2 of my cores, depending on program scaling (I doubt it's true 1:1).
  16. runit3
    Don't upgrade your GPU now, Polaris/Pascal right around the corner. Unless you absolutely hate the performance of your system it's fine for the time being IMO (assuming you're playing at 1080p). If you had to upgrade, GPU would be the best route, and R9-390/X > 970.
  17. runit3
    What are you using to create your installation media? Simply creating a data disc with an ISO on it won't work. Follow these directions: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/windows-usb-dvd-download-tool Would highly recommend going the USB boot device route.
  18. runit3
    Flip the "EZ XMP" switch on the MOBO to whatever position it is not currently in and try again.
  19. runit3
    1.4v for Skylake is low. I would expect even a 212 EVO to handle a 1.4v load under 90C on synth benches. 1.45-1.5v+ is where coolers have trouble keeping up, this isn't Haswell.
  20. runit3
    The NH-D14/15 perform roughly equally to nearly every 240mm AIO on the market, you can't get much better cooling performance unless you were going to spend x3 the money on a custom loop. 1.35-1.4v for Skylake is a very low threshold, AIO or air shouldn't matter either way. I have 2 EK Vardars (FF-5) and they are marginally better at full bore, but they are LOUD. The static pressure optimized fans that come with an AIO are not likely to be measurably worse than any other fan unless you're running them up against voltage regulated ultra-low RPM fans (NF-F12 w/voltage adapter). TDP is a relatively meaningless value. Average power (wattage) consumption and load temperatures are meaningful metrics.
  21. runit3
    1. Comment below listing the following specs of your PC: Rig name: Flurple Cpu: 5960X (4.5 core 4.375 cache) Gpu: R9-290X (8GB) Ram: G.Skill 16GB 3000MHz DDR4 Score: 6.8 2. Add a screenshot of your SteamVR Performance Test results.
  22. runit3
    360x45 + 240x35 rads. Never above 85C. Thermal throttle kicks in at 1.6-1.65v depending on the bench.
  23. runit3
    If you're staying within the same generation of CPU/MOBO you should be able to transfer over to a new board with relatively few issues. Any MOBO will file through the boot device list until it hits MBR, what port you had it previously plugged into is meaningless. The only thing you may have to do is reactivate your Windows license over the phone with their automatic service. Takes around 5 minutes. Every HP/Dell/OEM board I've had my hands on from that gen has had an Intel NIC, even those drivers will probably port over no problem assuming it's a PROSet gen NIC on the new board.
  24. runit3
    anecdotal evidence is anecdotal. For every 1 angry review there are hundreds of positive ones never posted. I was an early X99 adopter and got burned by a bad kit of RAM, but both my X99 Deluxe and Sabertooth are chugging along happy as ever -no issues with either board. If you're going to be waiting for anything it would be the Broadwell-e release, the boards should remain relatively unchanged at this point.
  25. runit3
    I've had mine at 1.39v for quite a while now. I haven't experienced any voltage degradation under 1.4v for all of my Haswell chips (they range from 1.35-1.39). All of them are under water aside from the 5820k, but with the NH-D14 it might as well be.
×