LordMustangGT

Why would Steve need to confront you about making a story about you? This is what he does, calls people out. I've been watching you since the garage days and NCIX days. Your videos have gone WAY!, down hill. You've said you know, and you're working on it, but, nothing has change. I went from, I can't wait to watch your videos, to watching maybe 1 in 10. They are that bad, or that pointless. 

I worded that A little weird there, but what I meant to say is, most will wait a week for a video, no be deal. If it was a dollar a month, I'd think you'd be killing it right now, but 3 bucks a channel... is that what it still is?? Drugs people, drugs.       
 
 
FYI, Im super sarcastic. 

this is exactly what I would do, dual opterons for sure, maybe even pop for a quad opteron mobo, tho, finding a quad opteron mobo with lots of pcie slots seems to be hard. maybe I just haven't look hard enough yet..

this would just be a fun side computer build. obviously I would still use my 9590 machine for gaming

I was thinking of getting the 2.8-3.0ghz models if I was too. C32 cpus are cheap, and the slower G34 aren't bad, but 2.8ghz G34 are still like 1500 bucks

1) it will vary but yeah thats fine, the game is going to be high end when it comes out and its not even remotely done yet

2) the graphics settings dont do much yet they are mostly focusing on content

3) hit the tilde key (the little ` above your tab button) when in game and type in. r_motionblur = 0

bonus: if you want to get rid of vsync because its more of a nuisance type in: r_vsync = 0
 

So you wanted to be marked as a fanboy and someone who should be ignored just for a laugh? Real smooth.

I have screen shots of msi afterburner with both card flat out aswell, then I still get people that say it aint so.  haha  

that graph is wrong, I'm getting frame rates that the 5960 is getting, and I have turbo off, and it running at stock 4.7 all the time, just wanted to say.

i seen people run way more on way less than my cpu
it will run it just fine it might run a tiny bit better on a i7 but thats about it
you guys throw around the word bottleneck whenever u feel like it but theres a difference between bottleneck and better performance 

I was playing at 5760x1080, everything to the max, but have msaa off. I don't know what a single 1080 screen would be...

Guys the 9590 is the chip I have chosen that fits my situation best it might not fit your needs but it meets my needs you can go enjoy your Intel chips I will enjoy my AMD chip.

agreed, 6300FX still games pretty good, dear god its not the best, ok intel guys I said it, BUT, most the time you can find the 6300 on sale for like 90 bucks US.

asus sabor 990FX. Built my buddy a comp with that board, 6300 OC to 4.8, and sli 770s

asus sabor 990FX. Built my buddy a comp with that board, 6300 OC to 4.8, and sli 770s

M5 990FX Is the cheapest decent borad and will oc nice like. But if you can afford it, a Asus sabortooth or gigabyte UD5. all the 990FX chipset boards

I'm happy with what I got. I'm an AMD guy, said this many times before, I may end up going intel when skylake comes out, but for now, this is one hell of a machine. Planing a full waterloop next

As much as everyone says it would "bottleneck", this thing runs fine with sli and AMD. Yeah, sure, you could pick up a little more performance going to intel, but I'm quite happy with mine still.
 

 
 
 

I just happen to have black flag screenshots too. I don't play arma and I don't have crisis lol. It runs bf4 ultra, 5760x1080, 60-80avg and goes as high as 130 in parts. The minimums have improved so much is what I like best in all games. black flag avg 60fps now to instead of 30. BF4 was around 30-40fps avg before the sli.

As much as everyone says it would "bottleneck", this thing runs fine with sli and AMD. Yeah, sure, you could pick up a little more performance going to intel, but I'm quite happy with mine still.
 

 
 
 

ya, I went for a athlon64 x2 3.2ghz to a 9590. I waited so long anything was better than what I had, And I'm an AMD guy so I got a deal on a 9590. I'm still happy with my choice.

not worried about the hate, its whatever around here, there's always intel and AMD haters. Soon as I get the third card tho, have to go 4790K, it will be my first intel ever, and I've had AMD since the old K6-2 550mhz.

this is exactly what I would do, dual opterons for sure, maybe even pop for a quad opteron mobo, tho, finding a quad opteron mobo with lots of pcie slots seems to be hard. maybe I just haven't look hard enough yet..

this would just be a fun side computer build. obviously I would still use my 9590 machine for gaming

I've searched on here but can't find a defined answer..   Why not? So what if its a cpu for workstations..  So are xeons but people use them for gaming? The other ?, I understand that games only use so many cores, but what about video cards need all the overhead, per say running quad sli..   And I guess the other obvious question is, if I were to spend that money, why not just go 2011 intel 8 core w/ HT. Well, I guess cuz I don't see it done much. I do like my AMDs over intel as well. I'm not by any means saying AMD is the best per specs out, just my choice. And the other thing is, finding sli mobo for opterons..  Just some thoughts.