All Activity

I'd trust @Somerandomtechyboi, when he speaks about RAM it looks like hieroglyphics to me, so he probably knows what he's talking about.

if you can get your hands on it the b650e tachyon is a really good ram oc board aswell just that its basically non existent availability wise i mean delidding would help alot when the cores are already insulated by the cache then add to that garbage ihs thats too thick + 8 extra cores putting heat into that ihs but im pretty sure even if you delid youll still hit thermal limit on the cache ccd much sooner than the non cache ccd because the cache itself is an insulator think if you really wanted to do any sort of actual oc youd wanna chill the thing to subzero so no more thermal limits, then itd probably oc just like any other non cache ccd (5.5+), but youd have to be quite the rich nerd to also build a phase change system, i would but im not rich =p (for now atleast)

Its Micro ATX, it was the first board I was considering, but its just way too expensive. ROG CROSSHAIR X670E GENE | Gaming motherboards｜ROG - Republic of Gamers｜ROG Global (asus.com) Last board in this series I had was the X79 gene that I ran SLI 780ti's on. It was after this board I downsized to mITX with a single GTX 980 and bought that Z79 Impact VII.

Huh, TIL RAM Speed Groups https://www.crucial.in/support/memory-speeds-compatability Again, these are gonna be *really* similar in performance, but the Corsair sticks have a slightly higher base speed grade Personally I'd go with corsair just because I have run a lot of their dimms and they've always handled RMA well, but freal, don't stress, it won't matter much

corsair as its dual rank so abit of a performance boost over the teamgroup clock for clock an exception would be if you are gonna run on an amd apu then youd wanna go for the teamgroup unless you can verify that the corsair is samsung d die (capable of ~4600) and not shitty c die or even unbinned b die that definitely wont clock past 4000

Gene is an ITX board, it'll look ridiculous in my P600S case, nah Will use 2 DIMMs (2x32) anyway, know my Ryzen

Hosting opensource P2P file shares is a pretty good way to contribute bandwidth. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1176457/the-best-resources-to-get-involved-in-p2p-file-sharing-project I always have a pretty recent siterip of .en and .ru wikipedia seeding as well as a couple *actual* linux ISOs

I don't think overclocking on the 7950x3D is a good idea unless you're delidding. Regardless of CCD configuration, CCD0 will reach thermal throttling at 4.8-4.9GHz all core. I've considered delidding mine and buying the NH-D15 delid kit just to prove this point. Delidded, I suspect I'd see that 5.25GHz boost almost always, where doing bclk OCing might be worth it.

Ah, I'm not sure anyone really wants that though. The Pro cards already have no actual limit on number of encode streams just performance/quality limit and they can do over 30 streams per card on Ampere at 1080p/30 high enough bit rate. https://docs.nvidia.com/video-technologies/video-codec-sdk/12.1/nvenc-application-note/index.html

Even if it supports it, remove the spaces from the share.

My usecase is mostly gaming (non competitive, graphics intensive 3440x1440p), office work, browsing etc, nothing really intensive The build is obviously as much overkill as a Maserati in countries limited to 130km/h at best, I admit, but hey that's not a fault I'm also sure all of them are good, that's why I can decide, wanted to hear from people about what they think about them or the experience they have with Prices are all in a 40EUR range, so no significant difference Regarding support my X570 is still well supported after 4 year, aren't you referring to Intel ?

The root cause is probably not ram shaking or moving in its place. May be bad ram, bad PSU etc.

Welcome to the forums! The TeamGroup kit has tighter timings, but both are gonna perform very similarly

TBH, pretty fair. And kinda the ideal. You really don't want to need to know what brand you're using, it should just get out of the way and let you compute

You can always seed Linux distributions using any other BitTorrent client if you have more bandwidth than you need.

Welcome to the forums! Ooof, that's HARD. I'd be really tempted to ditch the CC storage, set up a VPN for remote workers to edit off the QNAP, and use B2 to backup the NAS. That way you have an authoritative data source, plus a full backup all with no syncing issues.

aorus master has eclk if you wanna overclock the cache cores on the 7950x3d same goes for the e-e but for whatever reason the carbon wifi has no eclk still pretty stupid to get a high end board as they really arent worth it unless youll use the features or i/o in which case the only real thing that differentiates the lowend and highend is mostly eclk and usb 4 ports it was more important back in the fsb oc era where youd want a high end board to run high fsbs but even that has its diminishing returns, best thing at the end of 775 for max fsb was the giga ep45 ud boards and even then youd probably hit cpu or ram limit before boardlimit on a non ud board (could not boot past 620fsb on my best e8400 on both a ud3r and ds4p probs cpu limit as my xtreem dark will do 1500+) and on the previous generation there was the p5k and giga g33 boards. bclk era on x58 and 1156 made high end irrelevant aside from frequency records or benching when youd be stuck at 220 ish bclk without slowmode, id definitely notice the switch from my x58a ud3r to an x58a oc for clocking triple channel as this thing flakes out past 2800 on the 3rd channel where the x58a oc should do 3000+ easy, but an average joe that isnt gonna be running 3000+ (probs some slow ass ~2000 ddr3 or slower) or a golden sample chip would not notice any difference whatsoever, and funnily enough the best board for bclk on 1156 is an h55m ud2h of all things not even a p55 board let alone a high end one, after that high end only affected ram oc and that still remains true nowadays nowadays you get a high end board for features and i/o, overclocking wise youd be looking at 2dimmers and thats about it, literally only affects ram overclocking which almost noone does atleast not any serious overclocks especially not for daily so this is pretty much irrelevant for everyone but me if money was of no concern id probably get an x670e gene just because its a top end 2dimmer, maybe it isnt that much better than the hdv atm since they seem to be imc limited for now at 10800 and 11000 respectively looking at hwbot but it might shine once the next gen apus launch with better imcs and hopefully 12000+ ddr5, also has some extra stuff like postcodes and i assume eclk aswell since its a crosshair board, then stuff id probably never use like dual usb4 on the rear i/o

Note: I am not a lawyer. As far as I know, there aren't any cases where someone modified a patched Switch and actually went to court against Nintendo for it. Even the injunction filed by Nintendo against a seller of these chips wasn't actually the sort of case where it would establish case law - the defendant failed to respond, so Nintendo won by default judgment. From my understanding, the reason that it is probably illegal is that there are provisions in the DMCA that make it illegal to circumvent copyright protections. However, I've never heard of an actual case where these laws have ever been successfully prosecuted against an individual who simply bought such a chip - that is not when it would become illegal. It would probably be illegal the moment that you used the chip to circumvent any form of DRM or other copyright protection, and it would probably be illegal to sell such a chip, but simply buying and having the chip is fine. As for using the chip, even that isn't 100% for-sure illegal. The reason is that the DMCA isn't that clear on when circumvention would (if ever) be allowed. There is a provision in the law that mentions that nothing in the law "affect rights, remedies, limitations, or defenses to copyright infringement" - which means that you might be able to argue from a fair use perspective, or perhaps that your modification is simply a means of backing up information that doesn't violate copyright. However, this is unclear, and intentionally so. Part of the reason is that, in any situation where this comes up, the major corporation always moves to settle out of court to avoid it actually setting a legal precedent. Nintendo absolutely does not want to take a lone individual to court over this, because even if there's a 90% chance that they win, there's a 10% chance that using a modchip as a form of a backup is deemed legal, and such modchips can then be sold freely. All that to say, as far as I know, it is not illegal to own a modchip for your Switch, and it is only probably illegal for you to mod a patched Switch. Again, I am not a lawyer. If you ever want to try your hand at this, I would recommend that you contact an actual lawyer familiar with DMCA case law so you can discuss your particular use case and whether it is potentially legal.

Right, somehow forgot that I don't use Nvidia card now.

You might want to try running malwarebytes. Or at very very minimum running some form of scan. It sounds like you have something that's like a cryptominer running on your system. If you really don't want to run a scan [which I seriously recommend you run some scan] you could download process monitor (It's a Microsoft tool(. It shows a lot more detail of the processes running on your computer [and malware is less likely to throttle back] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/procmon If you do run a scan and find a virus/malware, I would recommend doing a clean install of Windows

tldr: physics! for starters, stationary, eh? EARTH ROTATION SPEED: 1670 kilometres per hour *literally* nothing on this planet is "stationary".

FreeSync Premium Pro is still fantastic from what I hear

Yeah, a bit mild difference, but all around. But not G-sync compatible like mentioned.