Footy

You can get a 500 user non-profit license for teamspeak easily enough

one of my VMs is running a TS server. Its got 2 cores, 2gb ram and runs ubuntu 14.10 The server gets 20-30 people on it, I rarely see CPU above 7-8% and RAM sits at about 350mb but occasionally hit 500mb

I complained about my disk speed and... Disk Speed----------I/O (1st run) : 148 MB/sI/O (2nd run) : 156 MB/sI/O (3rd run) : 147 MB/sAverage I/O : 150.333 MB/s Boom Fixed

its a lot of money for a marginal upgrade. Unless your games are unplayable I would wait, pretty sure were going to see some new CPU tech in 2017 which will change the game yet again.

wifi

Thats a kool little tool Here's my output System Info-----------Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1245 V2 @ 3.40GHzCPU Cores : 1Frequency : 3392.294 MHzMemory : 2001 MBSwap : 2043 MBUptime : 187 days, 1:30,OS : Ubuntu 14.10Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)Kernel : 3.16.0-24-genericHostname : XXXSpeedtest (IPv4 only)---------------------Your public IPv4 is xxx.xx.xx.xxxLocation Provider SpeedCDN Cachefly 11.3MB/sAtlanta, GA, US Coloat 5.26MB/sDallas, TX, US Softlayer 11.0MB/sSeattle, WA, US Softlayer 10.7MB/sSan Jose, CA, US Softlayer 10.6MB/sWashington, DC, US Softlayer 4.32MB/sTokyo, Japan Linode 8.18MB/sSingapore Softlayer 5.58MB/sRotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 10.5MB/sHaarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 11.1MB/sSpeedtest (IPv6 only)---------------------Your public IPv6 is 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx::3Location Provider SpeedAtlanta, GA, US Linode 5.43MB/sDallas, TX, US Linode 10.8MB/sNewark, NJ, US Linode 11.1MB/sFremont, CA, US Linode 10.7MB/sChicago, IL, US Steadfast 11.0MB/sTokyo, Japan Linode 6.38MB/sSingapore Linode 5.94MB/sFrankfurt, Germany Linode 10.3MB/sLondon, UK Linode 10.1MB/sHaarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 10.0MB/sDisk Speed----------I/O (1st run) : 83.9 MB/sI/O (2nd run) : 84.2 MB/sI/O (3rd run) : 84.1 MB/sAverage I/O : 84.0667 MB/s

I love the fact that your 0mbit and your only 99% slower

I don't think I'm going to do very well on this leader board :-( iPhone 6 Plus 241.5mb down 232.89mb up 5ms ping Samsung S6 Edge 329.10mb down 429.27mb up 2ms ping iPad Air 2 480.45mb down 460.97mb up 2ms ping

you've given limited information, but.... I'd guess that when your traffic is going from L3 Switch to the Virgin Media Router, It is being routed on the Cisco Router, then Virgin media router doesnt know about the return subnet. I dont know if you can set that static route on the virgin router, but you should be able to setup a NAT on the cisco router for traffic coming from the L3 switch to the Virgin router, which will allow the return traffic.

Just built a system for a friend Z170-E mobo 6600k 2x8gb ram corsair ram 1 x SSD 1 x HDD 1 x GTX970 Strix Asus 1 x 450D with 3 fans Case 1 x Corsair H60 1 pump + 1 fan Cooler 1 x DVD drive 1 x 850w Corsair psu Without any overclock Running; CPU & GPU stress test at the same time, the PSU reported a power draw peaking at 285W Not sure if that helps much for you but i thought it may be a good indicator

Diamond Speedstar I think, but it was a long long time ago Used an ISA slot for the gpu Cpu didnt have a heatsync ram was simm I think, if i remember right they had to be installed in pairs and the slots on the mobo were angled almost flush with the board... or was that rimm's?

its cheaper for a reason, I was with them when 50mb was the fastest they did and i barely got 1mb at peak times and at off peak i was lucky to get 4-5mb I had them out replace the equipment, run new cables to the house, tweek the signal strengths. but ultimately their internal speed test showed I was able to get full speed but their network capping was so bad. I switched to bt infinity 38mb service, then upped to 76mb and it was simply stunning, no throttling and i got about 68-72mb all day every day. I have now moved house and I sit happy with 1gbit down and up, how did i ever survive without it.

interesting, thanks for that. last time i used Netapp was on a 2050 sounds like things have moved on.

How do you deal with HA on file level storage? I used a netapp back in 2009 and it didn't support multiple active or seemless failover for file level, where as block has multipathing

no one knows as they don't currently exist.