Jump to content

When does TDP start to matter in terms of CPU temps?

I'm not sure if this applies everywhere else, but I live in a place where people firmly believe that AMD CPU's (primarily the 8350, 8320, 8XXX line) are hot and need to be liquid cooled regardless, even at stock voltage.


If I remember correctly, the transistor density of the 8350 is less than the 4770K/4790K or even the 4670K/4690K (not sure how many transistors this one has since I forgot). Then again, the 8350 has more than twice the TDP of the 4XXXK chips. I've seen some benchmarks, but I'm not posting them here since I am unsure if they are credible enough to be considered as reliable sources... and I forgot where to find them.

So, is the 8350/Pildriver (Is it Piledriver?) really cooler or hotter than the Haswell/Haswell Refresh (lets leave out Ivy Bridge, Haswell-E, Skylake, etc... out of this) chips? For the sake of a controlled environment, lets assume both of them are cooled by H100i's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean cpu temps?

The fx line runs way cooled and throttles around 70°C while the intel cpu run to around 80-90°C.

The fx cpus just put out more heat  though, the water and radiator temps will be higher  accordingly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if this applies everywhere else, but I live in a place where people firmly believe that AMD CPU's (primarily the 8350, 8320, 8XXX line) are hot and need to be liquid cooled regardless, even at stock voltage.

If I remember correctly, the transistor density of the 8350 is less than the 4770K/4790K or even the 4670K/4690K (not sure how many transistors this one has since I forgot). Then again, the 8350 has more than twice the TDP of the 4XXXK chips. I've seen some benchmarks, but I'm not posting them here since I am unsure if they are credible enough to be considered as reliable sources... and I forgot where to find them.

So, is the 8350/Pildriver (Is it Piledriver?) really cooler or hotter than the Haswell/Haswell Refresh (lets leave out Ivy Bridge, Haswell-E, Skylake, etc... out of this) chips? For the sake of a controlled environment, lets assume both of them are cooled by H100i's.

Temperature is misleading. Haswell actually generally runs at and handles higher temperatures than the 8350-series (due to the way intel's tim setup works). It however uses much less energy and all the energy any component generates eventually ends up as heat. Since Haswell uses around 50-75% of the power of the 8350 at stock speeds (and even less comparably with overclocks) it needs far less cooling to keep the temperatures within their respective safe limits.

 

Watercooling isn't needed on the 8350. It will help you reach higher clocks though (as you overclock it does tend to be thermally limited.)

LINK-> Kurald Galain:  The Night Eternal 

Top 5820k, 980ti SLI Build in the World*

CPU: i7-5820k // GPU: SLI MSI 980ti Gaming 6G // Cooling: Full Custom WC //  Mobo: ASUS X99 Sabertooth // Ram: 32GB Crucial Ballistic Sport // Boot SSD: Samsung 850 EVO 500GB

Mass SSD: Crucial M500 960GB  // PSU: EVGA Supernova 850G2 // Case: Fractal Design Define S Windowed // OS: Windows 10 // Mouse: Razer Naga Chroma // Keyboard: Corsair k70 Cherry MX Reds

Headset: Senn RS185 // Monitor: ASUS PG348Q // Devices: Note 10+ - Surface Book 2 15"

LINK-> Ainulindale: Music of the Ainur 

Prosumer DYI FreeNAS

CPU: Xeon E3-1231v3  // Cooling: Noctua L9x65 //  Mobo: AsRock E3C224D2I // Ram: 16GB Kingston ECC DDR3-1333

HDDs: 4x HGST Deskstar NAS 3TB  // PSU: EVGA 650GQ // Case: Fractal Design Node 304 // OS: FreeNAS

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×