Jump to content

Sony: 1080p 60fps Makes A Huge Difference

TwistedDictator
By TwistedDictator
in Tech News
 Share
Posted

I dont own the PS4/Xbox one yet, but I do have a 360 and PS4

 

Those steam games are like 11 years worth, which if you work it out is not that much a month

 

https://steamdb.info/calculator/76561197968752013/?cc=uk

 

According to that link its £5116 or £1302 with sales

 

So thats £38 a month on games or £9.86 with sales

 

11 years? Dude that means you've been using steam since it was utter shit with the HL2 launch and such, kudos on that I didn't predict it would become a viable product back then.

-------

Current Rig

-------

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

11 years? Dude that means you've been using steam since it was utter shit with the HL2 launch and such, kudos on that I didn't predict it would become a viable product back then.

 

Yeah HL2 FTW, I didn't consider viability back then because I was 14

 

Honestly never had a single complaint about steam, i'm either too ignorant, or just not effected enough to care

Desktop - Corsair 300r i7 4770k H100i MSI 780ti 16GB Vengeance Pro 2400mhz Crucial MX100 512gb Samsung Evo 250gb 2 TB WD Green, AOC Q2770PQU 1440p 27" monitor Laptop Clevo W110er - 11.6" 768p, i5 3230m, 650m GT 2gb, OCZ vertex 4 256gb,  4gb ram, Server: Fractal Define Mini, MSI Z78-G43, Intel G3220, 8GB Corsair Vengeance, 4x 3tb WD Reds in Raid 10, Phone Oppo Reno 10x 256gb , Camera Sony A7iii

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I would go with 30FPS over 60FPS and crappy graphics unless atheistic are pleasing.

I would never play a game at under 40 FPS. Being on PC and being able to choose what is acceptable to you is nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

"But the human eye can't see more than 24 FPS"

And 24 FPS is way more cinematic! Just keep digging :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

If you pay for them, they're not really free you know?

Context you ever heard of that ?

You only have to pay for PSN if you want to use PSN -- a PS4 is still functional without PSN (just no access to online games).

Except for some games like destiny play online with no PSN+.

  ﷲ   Muslim Member  ﷲ

KennyS and ScreaM are my role models in CSGO.

CPU: i3-4130 Motherboard: Gigabyte H81M-S2PH RAM: 8GB Kingston hyperx fury HDD: WD caviar black 1TB GPU: MSI 750TI twin frozr II Case: Aerocool Xpredator X3 PSU: Corsair RM650

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Took long enough. 

 (\__/)

 (='.'=)

(")_(")  GTX 1070 5820K 500GB Samsung EVO SSD 1TB WD Green 16GB of RAM Corsair 540 Air Black EVGA Supernova 750W Gold  Logitech G502 Fiio E10 Wharfedale Diamond 220 Yamaha A-S501 Lian Li Fan Controller NHD-15 KBTalking Keyboard

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I would never play a game at under 40 FPS. Being on PC and being able to choose what is acceptable to you is nice.

Well that's a weird standard but every person is different so I get what you're saying.

  ﷲ   Muslim Member  ﷲ

KennyS and ScreaM are my role models in CSGO.

CPU: i3-4130 Motherboard: Gigabyte H81M-S2PH RAM: 8GB Kingston hyperx fury HDD: WD caviar black 1TB GPU: MSI 750TI twin frozr II Case: Aerocool Xpredator X3 PSU: Corsair RM650

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Well that's one way to sell new consoles. When PS8 comes out, it will be 144FPS makes a huge difference. lol

Intel Xeon E5 1650 v3 @ 3.5GHz 6C:12T / CM212 Evo / Asus X99 Deluxe / 16GB (4x4GB) DDR4 3000 Trident-Z / Samsung 850 Pro 256GB / Intel 335 240GB / WD Red 2 & 3TB / Antec 850w / RTX 2070 / Win10 Pro x64

HP Envy X360 15: Intel Core i5 8250U @ 1.6GHz 4C:8T / 8GB DDR4 / Intel UHD620 + Nvidia GeForce MX150 4GB / Intel 120GB SSD / Win10 Pro x64

 

HP Envy x360 BP series Intel 8th gen

AMD ThreadRipper 2!

5820K & 6800K 3-way SLI mobo support list

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I would never play a game at under 40 FPS. Being on PC and being able to choose what is acceptable to you is nice.

 

I'm with you, I would rather play on a lower resolution to get 60 FPS than 1080 30 FPS. 

 

But being part of the PC master race (and a 980 on a 1080 monitor) I don't really have to pick and choose ;)

CPU: i9-13900k MOBO: Asus Strix Z790-E RAM: 64GB GSkill  CPU Cooler: Corsair H170i

GPU: Asus Strix RTX-4090 Case: Fractal Torrent PSU: Corsair HX-1000i Storage: 2TB Samsung 990 Pro

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Uh-huh. Of course it makes a difference now when they're releasing a 1080/60 game. It wasn't very important earlier this yeah though when the Order was coming out. In fact Sony allowed Ready at Dawn to make huge bullshit statements all the way up to the launch of that failure of a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Time to upgrade :D

 

I need a ps4 for uncharted 4...(and bloodborne and like 2 or 3 others)

 

 
 

 

Ubisoft cant see, they are still in a deep hole

 

Haha!  I'm in the same situation.  I got Bloodborne but no PS4 (hey... it was on sale!!!)

 

And yes, it's about time the consoles get on this 60 FPS train. 

Current Rig: i5 3570K @ 4.2 GHz, Corsair H100i, Asus Maximus V Gene, Asus GTX 970 Turbo, Patriot Viper Black Mamba 8 GB DDR-3 1600 (2x4GB), Sandisk 120 GB SSD + Seagate 500 GB HDD + WD Blue 1 TB HDD, XFX 750W Black Edition, Corsair 350D - https://ca.pcpartpicker.com/b/cbxrxr

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Well lol that at this modern time this has been said which was so obvious. Let's hope that it doesn't make crap ports and whatnot.

1080p60fps should be bare minimum for anything today. And I also mean maxing the video settings on optimized game.

I just can't wait when single gpu card comes that will drive 4K 144Hz which will be a breeze to run and be smooth without any drops.

| Ryzen 7 7800X3D | AM5 B650 Aorus Elite AX | G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5 32GB 6000MHz C30 | Sapphire PULSE Radeon RX 7900 XTX | Samsung 990 PRO 1TB with heatsink | Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360 | Seasonic Focus GX-850 | Lian Li Lanccool III | Mousepad: Skypad 3.0 XL / Zowie GTF-X | Mouse: Zowie S1-C | Keyboard: Ducky One 3 TKL (Cherry MX-Speed-Silver) | Beyerdynamic MMX 300 (2nd Gen) | Acer XV272U | OS: Windows 11 |

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

they want to take your cinematic experience by giving you more performance ?  :o

 

(those bastards)  <_<

CPU = A10 6800K (@4.3Ghz) / GPU = HD 8670D (@844mhz/ram@1866mhz) - 2016 ≠ Dual Cores - why learn Linux ? - OLD intel x4 cpu (Q6600) + amd HD 7950 - this is what i think on watts x dollar cost - CPU "bottlenecks" only start to show "at the super high end cards" (like the 390) if you have a 4 cores CPU

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Just when I decided to get a 144Hz Monitor, eh.

Bring the 60FPS capped games!

"It's a taxi, it has a FARE METER."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I would go with 30FPS over 60FPS and crappy graphics unless atheistic are pleasing.

 

If the option is there, I doubt you will choose choppy gameplay over smooth gameplay.

 

I hope that it won't become trend on consoles. 720p & 30hz is the way to go . We'll move forward a bit in graphics - both PC and console users . 

 

720p 30FPS is not the way to go, we are not in 2005 anymore, hell, there were PS2 games that ran at 60FPS.

The stars died for you to be here today.

A locked bathroom in the right place can make all the difference in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Guys you do know this just means the games will be even more tuned down for consoles....

LINK-> Kurald Galain:  The Night Eternal 

Top 5820k, 980ti SLI Build in the World*

CPU: i7-5820k // GPU: SLI MSI 980ti Gaming 6G // Cooling: Full Custom WC //  Mobo: ASUS X99 Sabertooth // Ram: 32GB Crucial Ballistic Sport // Boot SSD: Samsung 850 EVO 500GB

Mass SSD: Crucial M500 960GB  // PSU: EVGA Supernova 850G2 // Case: Fractal Design Define S Windowed // OS: Windows 10 // Mouse: Razer Naga Chroma // Keyboard: Corsair k70 Cherry MX Reds

Headset: Senn RS185 // Monitor: ASUS PG348Q // Devices: Note 10+ - Surface Book 2 15"

LINK-> Ainulindale: Music of the Ainur 

Prosumer DYI FreeNAS

CPU: Xeon E3-1231v3  // Cooling: Noctua L9x65 //  Mobo: AsRock E3C224D2I // Ram: 16GB Kingston ECC DDR3-1333

HDDs: 4x HGST Deskstar NAS 3TB  // PSU: EVGA 650GQ // Case: Fractal Design Node 304 // OS: FreeNAS

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I'm pretty surprised by how many of you guys are being suckered by this news. PS4 and Xbone are weak sauce. To get 60fps @ 1080p they'll have to reduce gfx.  

Well lol that at this modern time this has been said which was so obvious. Let's hope that it doesn't make crap ports and whatnot.

1080p60fps should be bare minimum for anything today. And I also mean maxing the video settings on optimized game.

I just can't wait when single gpu card comes that will drive 4K 144Hz which will be a breeze to run and be smooth without any drops.

It doesn't work like that. As games get more and more demanding. it takes stronger and more powerful gfx cards to run them, even at the same resolution. 

(also higher FPS seem to be more CPU limited?) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

If the option is there, I doubt you will choose choppy gameplay over smooth gameplay.

 

 

720p 30FPS is not the way to go, we are not in 2005 anymore, hell, there were PS2 games that ran at 60FPS.

Yep I know , but majority console users don't see the difference - so why bother? You have much more processing power for better graphics that is easier to advertise than 60hz.

Same goes for 720p. Yeah, 1:1 pixel mapping is the best , but if they can't tell the difference - why bother?

 

http://i.minus.com/iu6Q7apWCucfv.gif 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

1080p 60FPS is last gen, 1440p 60FPS is where its at

i9 11900k - NH-D15S - ASUS Z-590-F - 64GB 2400Mhz - 1080ti SC - 970evo 1TB - 960evo 250GB - 850evo 250GB - WDblack 1TB - WDblue 3TB - HX850i - 27GN850-B - PB278Q - VX229 - HP P224 - HP P224 - HannsG HT231 - 450D                                                         
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I'm pretty surprised by how many of you guys are being suckered by this news. PS4 and Xbone are weak sauce. To get 60fps @ 1080p they'll have to reduce gfx.  

It doesn't work like that. As games get more and more demanding. it takes stronger and more powerful gfx cards to run them, even at the same resolution. 

(also higher FPS seem to be more CPU limited?) 

I know all of that.

Since high resolution, thus good amount of pixel density is awesome so you don't see them and high refresh rate just makes it more fluid and gives you better feel of motion. Games should be made in mind that it can be higher refresh rate driven and base graphics on that. But lately most games are running at low fps while also not looking that amazing. I don't want in like 5y to see a game be between 20-40fps maxed out with high end hardware. That just sucks of majority of them would be like that. I can understand games like Crysis when it was in it's time, those are exceptions that truly go next gen and all.

Devs for new Doom explained it very well how it actually makes a ton of difference in terms of gameplay experience to have 60+ refresh rate.

 

We just need a bigger leap in performance to push 4K 144fps and make that a standard. That would be a great point where we no longer can see pixels just like that and have that high refresh rate at the same time to make everything flow. I can't imagine when we are going to see a single GPU be able to push next gen title at 4K 144fps with max detail, but when that comes it will be amazing.

A side, there will be people ow look I get 12fps at 8K and stuff like that.

 

And no, higher FPS isn't necessary CPU limited.

| Ryzen 7 7800X3D | AM5 B650 Aorus Elite AX | G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5 32GB 6000MHz C30 | Sapphire PULSE Radeon RX 7900 XTX | Samsung 990 PRO 1TB with heatsink | Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360 | Seasonic Focus GX-850 | Lian Li Lanccool III | Mousepad: Skypad 3.0 XL / Zowie GTF-X | Mouse: Zowie S1-C | Keyboard: Ducky One 3 TKL (Cherry MX-Speed-Silver) | Beyerdynamic MMX 300 (2nd Gen) | Acer XV272U | OS: Windows 11 |

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Yep I know , but majority console users don't see the difference - so why bother? You have much more processing power for better graphics that is easier to advertise than 60hz.

Same goes for 720p. Yeah, 1:1 pixel mapping is the best , but if they can't tell the difference - why bother?

 

http://i.minus.com/iu6Q7apWCucfv.gif 

Oh, console gamers can tell the difference, but they don't want to admit that 60FPS looks way smoother :P.

My friends, who have played on console for the most part of their life can tell the difference between 30 and 60FPS and 720p and 1080p.

The stars died for you to be here today.

A locked bathroom in the right place can make all the difference in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

higher fps at a lower resolution is always preferable to a crisp, headache-inducing slideshow. nice to see them shooting for both standard resolution and fps in a serious manner.

R9 3900XT | Tomahawk B550 | Ventus OC RTX 3090 | Photon 1050W | 32GB DDR4 | TUF GT501 Case | Vizio 4K 50'' HDR

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

If the option is there, I doubt you will choose choppy gameplay over smooth gameplay.

720p 30FPS is not the way to go, we are not in 2005 anymore, hell, there were PS2 games that ran at 60FPS.

You don't get it done you ? 30 FPS is perfectly smooth for me, it isn't as smooth as 60 FPS but it's still fine.

  ﷲ   Muslim Member  ﷲ

KennyS and ScreaM are my role models in CSGO.

CPU: i3-4130 Motherboard: Gigabyte H81M-S2PH RAM: 8GB Kingston hyperx fury HDD: WD caviar black 1TB GPU: MSI 750TI twin frozr II Case: Aerocool Xpredator X3 PSU: Corsair RM650

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

UNCHARTED AT 60FPS (well at least some of the time) HAS ME SUPER HYPED :D

 

Spoiler

i5 4670k, GTX 970, 12GB 1600, 120GB SSD, 240GB SDD, 1TB HDD, CM Storm Quickfire TK, G502, VG248QE, ATH M40x, Fractal R4

Spoiler

i5 4278U, Intel Iris Graphics, 8GB 1600, 128GB SSD, 2560x1600 IPS display, Mid-2014 Model

Spoiler

All the parts are here, just need to get customized cords to connect the motherboard to the front panel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I'm pretty surprised by how many of you guys are being suckered by this news. PS4 and Xbone are weak sauce. To get 60fps @ 1080p they'll have to reduce gfx.

Sure but there are still 1080 60 games that look like this http://www.metalgearinformer.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/MGSV-The-Phantom-Pain-TGS-2014-Screen-Quiet-African-Jungle-Gameplay-2.jpg

Or this

http://static1.gamespot.com/uploads/original/109/1095912/2640552-6836022255-metro.jpg

It's not a perfect solution, and graphics are compromised, but it's all up to developers how to use the hardware

Intel i5-3570K/ Gigabyte GTX 1080/ Asus PA248Q/ Sony MDR-7506/MSI Z77A-G45/ NHD-14/Samsung 840 EVO 256GB+ Seagate Barracuda 3TB/ 16GB HyperX Blue 1600MHZ/  750w PSU/ Corsiar Carbide 500R

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing Tech News

×