To m2 or to m3 Leica
The M3
Its a beautiful camera and I love the weight and feel of it. It is made of brass, which will show over time and use. I have the double stroke version and the film advance is butter smooth. I mention above that when I shoot my 35mm lens, I just use the whole viewfinder as my framelines. The viewfinder is amazingly bright and I do find focusing to be relatively easy. I've never had an issue loading film, but my M3 may have the loading upgraded (M4 version?). The M3 has no meter and I don't trust myself to read the light properly so I either use a handheld meter or use the voigtlander VC meter II pictured above/below. Its very accurate and very easy to use.
The M6
The M6 is not made of brass but is still has a solid weight and feel. My viewfinder is the 0.85× version and has these framelines: (35-135, 50-75, 90). The film advance is nice and smooth but the M3 feels nicer (in my opinion). Focusing is easy and the viewfinder is bright. Loading is a breeze, but that may be due to experience with these cameras. The light meter is fairly accurate.
If you asked me which one I would keep if I had to choose.... I would have a very hard time deciding. I would probably keep the M3 as I love the feel and I have other ways of meter the light when I need to nail the exposure. That said, the M6 is a great camera which I would be hard pressed to sell or get rid of. Good luck on your search of an M camera and keep us updated on which one you get. Have you considered an M5? They tend to go a bit cheaper then the other M cameras. Or a Voigtlander Bessa RM3 or RM2? They are a lot more affordable than Leicas and can take M mount lens.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now