Jump to content

TSMC delays the mass production of 16nm FinFET chips by up to 6 months

BiG StroOnZ

TSMC was meant to be ramping up its 16nm FinFET production any time before the end of the month, but the manufacturing company has provided an update for this, saying it is happy with the yield, but is pushing back mass production of 16nm to early 2015.

 

The company said this would happen in early 2015, but finished by saying it could even fall into Q3 2015. Once TSMC has reached mass production of its 16nm FinFET process, it will provide added performance and power savings when compared to current technologies. TSMC has said that it is happy with the first yields of 16nm FinFET, but will not start mass producing it until around the second half of next year. The company said: "On the yield learning side, the progress [of 16nm] is much better than our original plan."

 

TSMC continued "This is because the 16nm uses similar [bEOL] process to 20SOC, except for the transistor. Because of the excellent progress in yield learning and readiness in manufacturing maturity and also to meet customers' demand, we plan to pull in 16-nanometer volume production through the end of Q2 next year or early Q3 year 2015." The full reason behind the delay isn't known right now, but the demand of 20nm is growing quick with the launch of the new iPhone, with Apple tapping TSMC for the production of its A8 and A8X chips.

 

Apple has increased its orders to TSMC, which requires higher production capacities. This leads to TSMC needed to ensure it can sustain producing 16nm tech for other companies, as well as Apple, before it can dive into mass production. We should hopefully hear more about this early next year.

 

40660_04_tsmc_delays_the_mass_production

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Wonder how this will interfere with current progress. 

 

 

I dunno maybe it will delay some products.

Sound: Custom one pros, Audioengine A5+ with S8 sub.

K70 RGB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

pascal is supposed to be 16nm  but thats 2016 they are rumored to have skipped 20nm in favor of 16nm due to 20nm being so far behind meaning if AMD does indeed have 20nm chips and HBM etc nvidia will be struggling for a little bit to come up with a solution to beat them until 16nm

Processor: Intel core i7 930 @3.6  Mobo: Asus P6TSE  GPU: EVGA GTX 680 SC  RAM:12 GB G-skill Ripjaws 2133@1333  SSD: Intel 335 240gb  HDD: Seagate 500gb


Monitors: 2x Samsung 245B  Keyboard: Blackwidow Ultimate   Mouse: Zowie EC1 Evo   Mousepad: Goliathus Alpha  Headphones: MMX300  Case: Antec DF-85

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

What? TSMC failing to deliver on its originally promised time frame for new nodes? Nah, couldn't be!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

What? TSMC failing to deliver on its originally promised time frame for new nodes? Nah, couldn't be!

So true.

  ﷲ   Muslim Member  ﷲ

KennyS and ScreaM are my role models in CSGO.

CPU: i3-4130 Motherboard: Gigabyte H81M-S2PH RAM: 8GB Kingston hyperx fury HDD: WD caviar black 1TB GPU: MSI 750TI twin frozr II Case: Aerocool Xpredator X3 PSU: Corsair RM650

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's OK, not like any other company in the world is about to compete with them to mass produce such items in the next 12 months it is super high tech.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

whoever finds out how to go past 10nm is gonna make a LOT of money just sayin'

"If a Lobster is a fish because it moves by jumping, then a kangaroo is a bird" - Admiral Paulo de Castro Moreira da Silva

"There is nothing more difficult than fixing something that isn't all the way broken yet." - Author Unknown

Spoiler

Intel Core i7-3960X @ 4.6 GHz - Asus P9X79WS/IPMI - 12GB DDR3-1600 quad-channel - EVGA GTX 1080ti SC - Fractal Design Define R5 - 500GB Crucial MX200 - NH-D15 - Logitech G710+ - Mionix Naos 7000 - Sennheiser PC350 w/Topping VX-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Man, it seems like just yesterday we were discussing the move from 120nm to 90nm.  "wow', we thought, "they've broken the 100nm barrier".

Grammar and spelling is not indicative of intelligence/knowledge.  Not having the same opinion does not always mean lack of understanding.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×