Jump to content

R9 290 Showdown - Vapor-X R9 290 vs PCS+ R9 290

Guest

We get PowerColor in New Zealand!?!?!


CPU: Intel i5 4570 | Cooler: Cooler Master TPC 812 | Motherboard: ASUS H87M-PRO | RAM: G.Skill 16GB (4x4GB) @ 1600MHZ | Storage: OCZ ARC 100 480GB, WD Caviar Black 2TB, Caviar Blue 1TB | GPU: Gigabyte GTX 970 | ODD: ASUS BC-12D2HT BR Reader | PSU: Cooler Master V650 | Display: LG IPS234 | Keyboard: Logitech G710+ | Mouse: Logitech G602 | Audio: Logitech Z506 & Audio Technica M50X | My machine: https://nz.pcpartpicker.com/b/JoJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

We get PowerColor in New Zealand!?!?!

 

Yeah, Techworld are the only stockists. If you really want a PowerColor card and its not in stock at Techworld, I'm sure Scott can get it for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Your conclusion is flawed, and is clearly biased. As an owner of the PCS+ I was curious and by the end I realized that your opinion is not based on your review or experience with these cards.

1. You justify vaporX cooling performance on a lower fan speed.

2. You ignor fan speed for the sound test.

If your going to use fan speed as a justification for cooling and negate the cooling performance gap then you must do the same for fan noise.

Now the performance, cooling, and noise are all equal. The only difference is features.

WTF! You put 80$ of value on a light??? This is a 250-350$ card that's 20-30% more for a color changing light!! Oh and even if your card is visible, with the massive cooler it should never change colors!!

Computer: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/ZczbWZ ~$950

Computer w/ Peripherals: http://pcpartpicker.com/b/mZNNnQ ~$1650

Case: Blue s340 painted black CPU: 4790K OC to 4.5MHz Cooler: Dark Rock 3 GPU: Powercolor R9-290 MOBO: z97 MSI Gaming 5 RAM: Fury HyperX 2x8GB 1866Mhz PSU: Corsair rm750x Storage: 250GB 850 EVO & 1TB WD Black HeadPhones: HD598 SE Speakers: MAckie CR4 SE Keyboard: K70 Cherry-Brown Mouse: G9x Fans: Prolimatech Vortex 140mm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Love the reviews

Simple and straight to the point with no BS

keep it up!

Current Rig:   CPU: AMD 1950X @4Ghz. Cooler: Enermax Liqtech TR4 360. Motherboard:Asus Zenith Extreme. RAM: 8GB Crucial DDR4 3666. GPU: Reference GTX 970  SSD: 250GB Samsung 970 EVO.  HDD: Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB. Case: Phanteks Enthoo Pro. PSU: Corsair RM1000X. OS: Windows 10 Pro UEFI mode  (installed on SSD)

Peripherals:  Display: Acer XB272 1080p 240Hz G Sync Keyboard: Corsair K95 RGB Brown Mouse: Logitech G502 RGB Headhet: Roccat XTD 5.1 analogue

Daily Devices:Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact and 128GB iPad Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your conclusion is flawed, and is clearly biased. As an owner of the PCS+ I was curious and by the end I realized that your opinion is not based on your review or experience with these cards.

1. You justify vaporX cooling performance on a lower fan speed.

2. You ignor fan speed for the sound test.

If your going to use fan speed as a justification for cooling and negate the cooling performance gap then you must do the same for fan noise.

Now the performance, cooling, and noise are all equal. The only difference is features.

WTF! You put 80$ of value on a light??? This is a 250-350$ card that's 20-30% more for a color changing light!! Oh and even if your card is visible, with the massive cooler it should never change colors!!

Fan speed is irrelevant because if one runs a lower speed at the same temp and its quieter. Then it's the quoted cooler.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Watch the video... The pcs is louder, cooler, and at a higher fan speed.

He attributes the better cooling to the higher fan speed, but not the loader volume.

He argues that if the vapor x was running faster it could achieve the save cooling. By the same argument; if the PCS was running slower it could achieve the same quietness. His argument is flawed.

As such the only measured or observed distinction is cosmetic.

Computer: http://pcpartpicker.com/p/ZczbWZ ~$950

Computer w/ Peripherals: http://pcpartpicker.com/b/mZNNnQ ~$1650

Case: Blue s340 painted black CPU: 4790K OC to 4.5MHz Cooler: Dark Rock 3 GPU: Powercolor R9-290 MOBO: z97 MSI Gaming 5 RAM: Fury HyperX 2x8GB 1866Mhz PSU: Corsair rm750x Storage: 250GB 850 EVO & 1TB WD Black HeadPhones: HD598 SE Speakers: MAckie CR4 SE Keyboard: K70 Cherry-Brown Mouse: G9x Fans: Prolimatech Vortex 140mm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Watch the video... The pcs is louder, cooler, and at a higher fan speed.

He attributes the better cooling to the higher fan speed, but not the loader volume.

He argues that if the vapor x was running faster it could achieve the save cooling. By the same argument; if the PCS was running slower it could achieve the same quietness. His argument is flawed.

As such the only measured or observed distinction is cosmetic.

I have used both cards for weeks on end and with the default fan curve the Vapor-X is the quieter card for sure.

The PCS+ does cool very well but it requires higher fan speed to do so, compared to the Vapor-X, hence more noise too.

It might not show it as well in the video but IRL I can 100% say that the Vapor-X is quieter, lower fan speed is also a great plus for those who are going to overclock as it gives them more room to run a super aggressive fan curve.

Also no if you drop the PCS+ fan speed down it goes up quite a bit in terms of temps, at the same speed as the vapor-x it would be about 8 or 9c hotter.

For example if I ran the Vapor-X at 100% fan speed and the PCS+ at 100% and benched them, the Vapor-X would have lower temps.

I stand by what I said in the video, it my not portray it as well as possible, and as I said, the PCS+ is the best card if all you care about is performance, but the Vapor-X is the all around best R9 290.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×