FX-8350E benchmarks?

[ChipWoodChainSaw]

     I want to know if there is any lost in CPU power with the 8350E. I already have a PSU so it would be nice if i could get the overall power usage down. So if you know were i can view a benchmark that be great.

[Speedbird]

Well, there is no 8350e AFAIK. There is only the 8320e and the 8370e.

[Manny Calavera]

downvolt

 

and this is not how you save power lmao. switch to intel xeon when you are upgrading with 80+ gold psu and power efficient card ( maxwell <3 )

[LukaP]

     I want to know if there is any lost in CPU power with the 8350E. I already have a PSU so it would be nice if i could get the overall power usage down. So if you know were i can view a benchmark that be great.

just clock your cpu lower and youll see. or find a benchmark of any FX 8 core with that clock speed and voltage

downvolt

 

and this is not how you save power lmao. switch to intel xeon when you are upgrading with 80+ gold psu and power efficient card ( maxwell <3 )

1) intel xeons do take 80-140W so your argument is flawed here

2) save money by spending more money? 

3) maxwell still takes the same amount of power as kepler, it just converts more to FPS, and less to heat

[xox]

It just converts more to FPS, and less to heat

I have a large problem with this (quite ignorant) statement

 

To say I laughed would be an understatement

[LukaP]

I have a large problem with this (quite ignorant) statement

 

To say I laughed would be an understatement

do you REALLY want me to repeat all the things i said (and proved) in the last thread about this?

[harrynowl]

I have a large problem with this (quite ignorant) statement

 

To say I laughed would be an understatement

I think @LukaP means performance per watt increased, total board power consumption typically didn't decrease.

[xox]

do you REALLY want me to repeat all the things i said (and proved) in the last thread about this?

plz do, will be a top lol, may as well copy and paste, save us both time

[LukaP]

plz do, will be a top lol, may as well copy and paste, save us both time

read this thread, or if you cant be bothered, read the first two posts, but know that the second graph is system power consumption, and the first table is TDP

http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/217732-nvidia-lying-about-maxwell-gtx-980-specs-to-press/

 

then post back when you realise im right

[Manny Calavera]

just clock your cpu lower and youll see. or find a benchmark of any FX 8 core with that clock speed and voltage

1) intel xeons do take 80-140W so your argument is flawed here

2) save money by spending more money? 

3) maxwell still takes the same amount of power as kepler, it just converts more to FPS, and less to heat

 

1. cheapest xeon hyperthreaded and downvolt. not nearly as much and far beyond from amd proc or intel overclocked ones but still powerful.

2. i said, this is not how you save power. "...WHEN YOU ARE UPGRADING...."

3). i know what your train of thought is but.... its still power efficient

 

its efficient with power. makes more use of power.

 

 

Idk why did you even reply...

 

i made comment about downvolt also. for now, thats cool.

[xox]

read this thread, or if you cant be bothered, read the first two posts, but know that the second graph is system power consumption, and the first table is TDP

http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/217732-nvidia-lying-about-maxwell-gtx-980-specs-to-press/

 

then post back when you realise im right

And your point being, please?

 

Basically, the statement you made about it converting power into fps is bullshit.

 

It's physics, energy cannot be created nor destroyed...

[LukaP]

1. cheapest xeon hyperthreaded and downvolt. not nearly as much and far beyond from amd proc or intel overclocked ones but still powerful.

2. i said, this is not how you save power. "...WHEN YOU ARE UPGRADING...."

3). i know what your train of thought is but.... its still power efficient

 

its efficient with power. makes more use of power.

 

 

Idk why did you even reply...

 

i made comment about downvolt also. for now, thats cool.

you never specified the xeon...

well he is planning on changing now, your post implies he should change the psu

 

i replied because i felt the need to provide some proper information, not some halfassed posting

[LukaP]

And your point being, please?

 

Basically, the statement you made about it converting power into fps is bullshit.

 

It's physics, energy cannot be created nor destroyed...

maybe i have said it wrong. it uses the same amount of power, just less of it gets wasted as heat, more goes into transistors working, ergo you get more FPS. now if you dont understand, pm me and i will explain the physics behind it, but now i have to leave for a visit

[Manny Calavera]

you never specified the xeon...

well he is planning on changing now, your post implies he should change the psu

 

i replied because i felt the need to provide some proper information, not some halfassed posting

yes, op also didnt provide with much info he didnt even say what proc or system he has

my post doesnt imply he should change the psu now. I definitly said when you are upgrading.

 

"switch to intel xeon when you are upgrading with 80+ gold psu and power efficient card ( maxwell <3 )"

psu and maxwell card is included in upgrading.

 

go back to studying dicrete mathemathics haha

 

And i agree with second part.

 

And OP, talk to us, what system u have?

[xox]

maybe i have said it wrong. it uses the same amount of power, just less of it gets wasted as heat, more goes into transistors working, ergo you get more FPS. now if you dont understand, pm me and i will explain the physics behind it, but now i have to leave for a visit

The transistors working produces heat

 

Current passing through a wire or component with resistance produces heat. (resistance is according to v=ir  rearranged to r=v/i)

 

A frame does not take up power, a frame is not a thing (of matter or of energy [linked by E=MC²])

 

The power consumption is directly proportional to the heat that the graphics card produces, need I say more?

 

Here is an energy transfer diagram for your liking:

 

I tried to make it simple enough

 

The energy that you say is taken up to produce a frame is actually converted into heat energy (notice no "Frames" energy output on the diagram)

 

(yay, I just derailed the thread)

[airdeano]

umm, this side-debate should be moved to PM or another topic, not in the middle of this thread.

and since you noted, please don't derail.. 

[Manny Calavera]

Ok, i made a little diagram so everyone will understand.

 

Op, dont upgrade until you can afford better more power efficient cpu.

Downvolting is what u want, there are tutorials on web. What proc you have?

[LukaP]

... now if you dont understand, pm me and i will explain the physics behind it, but now i have to leave for a visit

 

 

(yay, I just derailed the thread)

 

 

umm, this side-debate should be moved to PM or another topic, not in the middle of this thread.

and since you noted, please don't derail.. 

told you to move it to pm if you want me to explain this in depth. you are somewhat correct, but not entirely