LTT 3DMark Thread

[arnavvr]

Considering I have the fastest chip on the market its a sad sad statement. They should abolish 720p testing

 

720p Testing, who runs 720p? Anyway if you are getting bottlenecked, you might want to move to a 14-core Xeon

[rtsurfer]

Considering I have the fastest chip on the market its a sad sad statement. They should abolish 720p testing

 

I agree.

 

We are getting a new 3DMark Benchmark with the official launch of DX12 later this year, that should make things much more fun.

[JustCallMeVlad]

720p Testing, who runs 720p? Anyway if you are getting bottlenecked, you might want to move to a 14-core Xeon

What resolution do you think firestrike tests at?

[DildorTheDecent]

Got my EVBot controller. Hopefully Precision X is wrong cos 1.5V isn't happening on air. 1.3 - 1.35V i'm good with. 

[Najuno]

What resolution do you think firestrike tests at?

The problem is that all the synthetic benchmarks are inaccurate when it comes to measure the real performance of the latest hardware because they are all outdated. Best example for me is Unigine Valley... I mean come on in 2015 a benchmark that lives of a single CPU core? Really?

 

The best benchmark for me right now is FS ULTRA, because it stresses the GPUs and doesn't rave too much around the CPU pure clock and Unigine Heaven 4.0.

 

Because no matter if people like that or not with DX12 when applications and games support more than 4 cores. This is where it shows the real potential of CPUs like we both have.  Heck even the FX series from AMD will probably see a nice bump up. That's why I will not recommend, unless money is super tight, an i5 anymore.

[arnavvr]

What resolution do you think firestrike tests at?

 

If you don't like 720p on Fireskrike, just use Firestrike Extreme.

[Raudi_]

What resolution do you think firestrike tests at?

Firestrike is 1080p, Extreme is 1440p and Ultra is 4k

[ApolloX75]

Firestrike is 1080p, Extreme is 1440p and Ultra is 4k

I always thought regular firestrike ran at 1280*720 or some such strange resolution.

It certainly doesn't look like 1080. Meh, more you know I guess.

[Raudi_]

Benchmark: Sky Diver

CPU: i7 4770k 4.3GHz

GPU: MSi R9 280 Gaming (Custom BIOS)

GPU Core: 1215

GPU Memory:1850

Score: 24118

3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/6444312


I can't even go past 1215 Core for benching for anything 3DMark in win 8.1 Its pretty annoying.

[JustCallMeVlad]

I always thought regular firestrike ran at 1280*720 or some such strange resolution.

It certainly doesn't look like 1080. Meh, more you know I guess.

Me too

[Najuno]

And I'll post it here one more time. Read an enjoy .

 

http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/330589-geforce-titan-x-owners-club-update/

[TheSLSAMG]

Benchmark: FireStrike
CPU: i7 4790K @ 4.6 GHZ
GPU: Asus GTX 970 STRIX
GPU Core: 1,500MHz
GPU Memory: 1777.5MHz

Score:10980

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/6447160

[JDS]

Benchmark: Firestrike

CPU: i5 4670k @ 4.6GHz

GPU: EVGA GTX 780 Ti SC

GPU Core: 1,240

GPU Memory: 1,915

Score: 11,039

Link: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/4469241

[Najuno]

I did some real benchmarking with the watercooled Titan X 2way SLI tonight, and what can I say? Impressive 4K results! Back in the top ten in 3D Mark´s HoF .

 

Unfortunately I couldn´t beat my GTX980 3way SLI scores, but this was done with also heavily modded BIOS on those cards with a boost of 1602 and 1618MHz. So I´m not unhappy about my results, because I know my score is extremer than most peoples 3way scores. So yeah I can say I´m able to beat normal OCed GTX980 in 3way with my Titan X 2way SLI .

 

Real world game performance is anyways off the table, since I´ve got in 4K better min FPS with the Titan X 2way SLI and no stuttering issues or scaling issues .

 

Benchmark: Fire Strike ULTRA
CPU: i7 5960X @ 4.6GHz
GPU: nVidia Titan X 2way SLI
GPU Core: 1574MHz
GPU Memory: 2021MHz

Score: 9461
3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/4469058

[Anarchyz11]

Benchmark: Fire Strike
CPU: i5-4690k @ 4.5GHz
GPU: GTX 980
GPU Core: 1,336MHz
GPU Memory: 1,913MHz

Score: 12223
3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/6462788

 

Also, don't know if Google sheets can do this like excel, but freezing the top 3 rows with freeze panes would be incredibly helpful.

[Najuno]

 

Benchmark: Fire Strike

CPU: i5-4690k @ 4.5GHz

GPU: GTX 980

GPU Core: 1,336MHz

GPU Memory: 1,913MHz

Score: 12223

3DMark Link: hhttp://www.3dmark.com/3dm/6462788

 

Also, don't know if Google sheets can do this like excel, but freezing the top 3 rows with freeze panes would be incredibly helpful.

 

Better ?

 

EDIT: Your link is wrong. I can´t put that in the spread sheet like that.

[Raudi_]

I did some real benchmarking with the watercooled Titan X 2way SLI tonight, and what can I say? Impressive 4K results! Back in the top ten in 3D Mark´s HoF .

 

Unfortunately I couldn´t beat my GTX980 3way SLI scores, but this was done with also heavily modded BIOS on those cards with a boost of 1602 and 1618MHz. So I´m not unhappy about my results, because I know my score is extremer than most peoples 3way scores. So yeah I can say I´m able to beat normal OCed GTX980 in 3way with my Titan X 2way SLI .

 

Real world game performance is anyways off the table, since I´ve got in 4K better min FPS with the Titan X 2way SLI and no stuttering issues or scaling issues .

 

Benchmark: Fire Strike ULTRA

CPU: i7 5960X @ 4.6GHz

GPU: nVidia Titan X 2way SLI

GPU Core: 1574MHz

GPU Memory: 2021MHz

Score: 9461

3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/4469058

Holy that core speed. I need to pick my jaw up off the floor.

[Najuno]

Holy that core speed. I need to pick my jaw up off the floor.

Man I feel the exact same way. That GM200 is one hell of a chip. I´m so damn impressed this goes beyond all imaginations .

 

My ASIC are 68.9% and 66.9% perfect for water cooling hehe.

[Raudi_]

Man I feel the exact same way. That GM200 is one hell of a chip. I´m so damn impressed this goes beyond all imaginations .

And here I am still wanting to put Kepler(GK110) Titan's under water and mod the piss out of them for at least 1450 MHz or more on the cores.

[Anarchyz11]

Better ?

 

EDIT: Your link is wrong. I can´t put that in the spread sheet like that.

 

Derp.  Must have posted a link to results I was viewing of someone else's.

Edited post, link is also here:

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/6462788

[Najuno]

Derp.  Must have posted a link to results I was viewing of someone else's.

Edited post, link is also here:

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/6462788

That´s more like it. Your CPU OC seems to be unstable because your time measurment is off, but as long as it isn´t a top score attempt I will let those scores always count .

 

BTW thanks for the tip with the freezed lines... I work so much with Excel and didn´t think about it in my sheet here...

[JDS]

@Najuno - I don't mean to bother you, but my score is in the incorrect ranking.  Thought I'd make you aware.

[Samfisher]

Somehow my post here disappeared, but here's a new one either way

 

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/4401356

 

i5-3570K @ 4.3GHz

GTX 970 G1 Gaming

+175 Core

+450 Mem

[Anarchyz11]

That´s more like it. Your CPU OC seems to be unstable because your time measurment is off, but as long as it isn´t a top score attempt I will let those scores always count .

 

BTW thanks for the tip with the freezed lines... I work so much with Excel and didn´t think about it in my sheet here...

 

My entire job is just Excel, as depressing as that is, and my boss is super anal about freezed panes.  So every spreadsheet I see, panes immediately need to be freezed before my OCD takes over and I kill a goat.

Also, thanks for the heads up about the CPU OC, had no idea what that meant.  It's the first time I've had an unlocked CPU and have no experience with it beyond the last week.  Looks like I've got more work to do on it. 

[Najuno]

@Najuno - I don't mean to bother you, but my score is in the incorrect ranking.  Thought I'd make you aware.

Hey thanks for pointing that out to me. It's always important to me that the sheet is accurate .