Jump to content

THIS CPU IS GOD FOR A 4 YEAR CPU, it just put the 4770k in the bin

ofc it has, 2 more cores, even though its an old arch. plus its running quite a high frequency too

"Unofficially Official" Leading Scientific Research and Development Officer of the Official Star Citizen LTT Conglomerate | Reaper Squad, Idris Captain | 1x Aurora LN


Game developer, AI researcher, Developing the UOLTT mobile apps


G SIX [My Mac Pro G5 CaseMod Thread]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

wot? EDIT my pic didnt load :P

|| MAELSTROM ||

|| i5 3570K W/ CM 212x @ 4GHz || r9 290 Windforce || Corsair Obsidian 450D || 2tb HDD + 120gb 840 evo SSD || 2x4gb Hyperx Fury Blue

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 i has 4770k?

|| MAELSTROM ||

|| i5 3570K W/ CM 212x @ 4GHz || r9 290 Windforce || Corsair Obsidian 450D || 2tb HDD + 120gb 840 evo SSD || 2x4gb Hyperx Fury Blue

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

ofc it has, 2 more cores, even though its an old arch. plus its running quite a high frequency too

true but for a 4 year old cpu im gonna try to get to 3930k level

4.51ghz and still going 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

true but for a 4 year old cpu im gonna try to get to 3930k level

4.51ghz and still going 

how did you even unlock it?

"Unofficially Official" Leading Scientific Research and Development Officer of the Official Star Citizen LTT Conglomerate | Reaper Squad, Idris Captain | 1x Aurora LN


Game developer, AI researcher, Developing the UOLTT mobile apps


G SIX [My Mac Pro G5 CaseMod Thread]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, 4 years of Cinebenching

Hueheuheueheuehee :3

 

Joke. For video editing and well threaded workload is faster. But for gaming, 4770k destroys it.

 

EDIT: oh you overclocking it :o that changes everything. This cpu is good for at least 6 years lmao if it doesnt die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, 4 years of Cinebenching

Hueheuheueheuehee :3

 

Joke. For video editing and well threaded workload is faster. But for gaming, 4770k destroys it.

 

EDIT: oh you overclocking it :o that changes everything

still, its not 33% faster than a 4770k, so its not better for slightly threaded workloads like games. it does destroy it at rendering tho. :P

"Unofficially Official" Leading Scientific Research and Development Officer of the Official Star Citizen LTT Conglomerate | Reaper Squad, Idris Captain | 1x Aurora LN


Game developer, AI researcher, Developing the UOLTT mobile apps


G SIX [My Mac Pro G5 CaseMod Thread]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

And it uses more power than the 4770K, while only being a little faster...

But thats expected for its age and CPU spec.

Maximums - Asus Z97-K /w i5 4690 Bclk @106.9Mhz * x39 = 4.17Ghz, 8GB of 2600Mhz DDR3,.. Gigabyte GTX970 G1-Gaming @ 1550Mhz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

And it uses more power than the 4770K, while only being a little faster...

But thats expected for its age and CPU spec.

nah not that much power 95watts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

still, its not 33% faster than a 4770k, so its not better for slightly threaded workloads like games. it does destroy it at rendering tho. :P

at rendering 33% faster not core 2 core :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

nah not that much power 95watts

I considered the overclock included too, but yeah It's not that big of a jump... for any overclocker that can be normal I guess.

Maximums - Asus Z97-K /w i5 4690 Bclk @106.9Mhz * x39 = 4.17Ghz, 8GB of 2600Mhz DDR3,.. Gigabyte GTX970 G1-Gaming @ 1550Mhz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I considered the overclock included too, but yeah It's not that big of a jump... for any overclocker that can be normal I guess.

4.62 still going

stable 74c max

I considered the overclock included too, but yeah It's not that big of a jump... for any overclocker that can be normal I guess.

the only issues with the CPU is the actual motherboard x58 lacks a lot of newer features some don't even support Trim on SSDs

4.72 at 1.45vcore still going

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  1. Slower at stock speeds than the 4770K at stock

Was more expensive when it launched

Uses more power

Worse IPC

More expensive platform

...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

  1. Slower at stock speeds than the 4770K at stock
  2. Was more expensive when it launched
  3. Uses more power
  4. Worse IPC
  5. More expensive platform
  6. ...

 

 

None of that means anything. These CPUs are selling for around £70, less than 1/3 the cost of a 4790k now.

 

As for X58 lacking features? there are plenty of lanes on a decent board, all you need is a SATA III Rocket card and a USB3 card and you're sorted.

 

People are not rushing out to buy these and find boards for them mate. They're buying them to replace their I7 920 as an example and the Westmeres clock higher and run cooler. A fantastic upgrade if you have a reasonable X58 platform to drop it into.

 

As for the pluses? lots of PCIE lanes. SLI and Xfire support, Triple channel DDR3 as opposed to Hasfails dual channel..... It goes on. Stop being a wet blanket.

Area 51 2014. Intel 5820k@ 4.4ghz. MSI X99.16gb Quad channel ram. AMD Fury X.Asus RAIDR.OCZ ARC 480gb SSD. Velociraptor 600gb. 2tb WD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

how did you even unlock it?

nah just bumping the base clock

None of that means anything. These CPUs are selling for around £70, less than 1/3 the cost of a 4790k now.

As for X58 lacking features? there are plenty of lanes on a decent board, all you need is a SATA III Rocket card and a USB3 card and you're sorted.

People are not rushing out to buy these and find boards for them mate. They're buying them to replace their I7 920 as an example and the Westmeres clock higher and run cooler. A fantastic upgrade if you have a reasonable X58 platform to drop it into.

As for the pluses? lots of PCIE lanes. SLI and Xfire support, Triple channel DDR3 as opposed to Hasfails dual channel..... It goes on. Stop being a wet blanket.

ture 4.82 still going

4.72 at 1.45vcore still going

4.82 at 1.48vcore still going

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

None of that means anything. These CPUs are selling for around £70, less than 1/3 the cost of a 4790k now.

 

As for X58 lacking features? there are plenty of lanes on a decent board, all you need is a SATA III Rocket card and a USB3 card and you're sorted.

 

People are not rushing out to buy these and find boards for them mate. They're buying them to replace their I7 920 as an example and the Westmeres clock higher and run cooler. A fantastic upgrade if you have a reasonable X58 platform to drop it into.

 

As for the pluses? lots of PCIE lanes. SLI and Xfire support, Triple channel DDR3 as opposed to Hasfails dual channel..... It goes on. Stop being a wet blanket.

 

Try booting of a SATA expansion card, most older boards don't support this.

USB3 support is still lacking big time on 3rd party chipsets, so don't expect too much of it.

 

And of course you can find second hand stuff cheaper than new stuff, but that's kinda the point, isn't it? But you have no warranty on any of those parts.

 

Also, how was Haswell a "hasfail"? It's the consumer line, if you expected anything big here, you were just wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

the only issues with the CPU is the actual motherboard x58 lacks a lot of newer features some don't even support Trim on SSDs

They have AHCI (-> trim).

 

None of that means anything. These CPUs are selling for around £70, less than 1/3 the cost of a 4790k now.

 

As for X58 lacking features? there are plenty of lanes on a decent board, all you need is a SATA III Rocket card and a USB3 card and you're sorted.

 

People are not rushing out to buy these and find boards for them mate. They're buying them to replace their I7 920 as an example and the Westmeres clock higher and run cooler. A fantastic upgrade if you have a reasonable X58 platform to drop it into.

 

As for the pluses? lots of PCIE lanes. SLI and Xfire support, Triple channel DDR3 as opposed to Hasfails dual channel..... It goes on. Stop being a wet blanket.

Scoring basically the same as a 4770K at 4.4GHz orsomething, has 2 more cores and 4 more threads. Single threaded difference is already a bare minimum of 50%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try booting of a SATA expansion card, most older boards don't support this.

USB3 support is still lacking big time on 3rd party chipsets, so don't expect too much of it.

 

And of course you can find second hand stuff cheaper than new stuff, but that's kinda the point, isn't it? But you have no warranty on any of those parts.

 

Also, how was Haswell a "hasfail"? It's the consumer line, if you expected anything big here, you were just wrong.

 

Most old X58 boards have RAID controllers on them, which you can easily boot from.

 

I ran a Highpoint Rocketraid card in my X58 and that was a bloody Foxconn. USB3 isn't even native to X79, mate. Intel couldn't be arsed so left it to the AIBs.

 

Warranty schmarranty. LOL who cares if it works?

 

Hasfail. Really hot version of Ivybridge that doesn't clock anywhere near as far so in reality is no better. See also - Sandy to Ivy. And X79 to X99 - etc etc.

 

Hasfail, because it was so bad Intel had to re-launch it as Devil's Canyon with another new socket just to fix the errors they made with Hasfail. People all lapped it up as usual.

Area 51 2014. Intel 5820k@ 4.4ghz. MSI X99.16gb Quad channel ram. AMD Fury X.Asus RAIDR.OCZ ARC 480gb SSD. Velociraptor 600gb. 2tb WD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have AHCI (-> trim).

 

my old p6x58d-e board the marvell controller didn't support it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

my old p6x58d-e board the marvell controller didn't support it

You're not supposed to use 3rd party sata controllers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most old X58 boards have RAID controllers on them, which you can easily boot from.

 

I am not talking about the RAID function that the X58 chipset supported. Booting for a 3rd party RAID controller often is not supported by either the card itself of the board.

 

Warranty schmarranty. LOL who cares if it works?

 

People do care about warranty, components can fail within the 2 year warranty, so are even more likely to fail after 4-6 years. 

 

Hasfail. Really hot version of Ivybridge that doesn't clock anywhere near as far so in reality is no better. See also - Sandy to Ivy. And X79 to X99 - etc etc.

 

Hasfail, because it was so bad Intel had to re-launch it as Devil's Canyon with another new socket just to fix the errors they made with Hasfail. People all lapped it up as usual.

 

First, Devil's Canyon is still Haswell, they use the same socket and 80-series chipsets just need a BIOS update to run them (same with 60-series boards and Ivy Bridge).

Second, the first haswell chips do indeed run hotter but they are still good chips. Intel has been giving us about 10% IPC upgrades for a few generations now, so again, if you expected more, than you were wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×