Jump to content

More case fans, or big case fans?

FineVisionz
Go to solution Solved by scaryjam823,

More smaller case fans, or a few big case fans?

http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/322958-31-smaller-fans-cooling

 

"Area a circle A = Pi times r squared

 
A 200 mm fan has 0.0314 square meters area [ believe me I did the math ]
 
a 140 mm fan has 0.015 square meters , but there are two of them so 0.030 
 
The single 200mm fan has more area [ just] than two smaller fans , and even more again when you consider that all three fans have a similar size hub sizes and you lose that area twice with the smaller fans .
 
Also if a 200 mm fan is spinning at the same speed as a 140 mm fan the tips of the blades are moving much faster . This is part of the reason why a larger fan doesnt have to spin so fast to move more air . A bonus of that is that it then makes less noise 
 
One big fan , not two small ones"
 
"Hmm guna do the math and write it out here to see the outcome :)
 
Pi (3.142) x Radius ((70mm)140mm fan) Squared
Effectively 70x70x3.142
= 15395.8
Now x2 (because there would be x2 140mm fans) 
= 30791.6
 
Ok so now the 200mm fan:
 
Pi (3.142) x Radius ((100mm)200mm fan) Squared
Effectively 100x100x3.142
= 31420
"
 
To add, a larger fan will spin slower and be quieter than smaller fans. I have the largest fan sizes I can have in my case. 4x200mm, 2x 140mm, 2x 120mm, 1x80mm, 1x120mm. It's pretty quite and stays cool, it was  even quite when I just had the 200mm fans installed.

Depends on what case you currently have, and your fan setup.

Shot through the heart and you're to blame, 30fps and i'll pirate your game - Bon Jovi

Take me down to the console city where the games are blurry and the frames are thirty - Guns N' Roses

Arguing with religious people is like explaining to your mother that online games can't be paused...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

More smaller case fans, or a few big case fans?

http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/322958-31-smaller-fans-cooling

 

"Area a circle A = Pi times r squared

 
A 200 mm fan has 0.0314 square meters area [ believe me I did the math ]
 
a 140 mm fan has 0.015 square meters , but there are two of them so 0.030 
 
The single 200mm fan has more area [ just] than two smaller fans , and even more again when you consider that all three fans have a similar size hub sizes and you lose that area twice with the smaller fans .
 
Also if a 200 mm fan is spinning at the same speed as a 140 mm fan the tips of the blades are moving much faster . This is part of the reason why a larger fan doesnt have to spin so fast to move more air . A bonus of that is that it then makes less noise 
 
One big fan , not two small ones"
 
"Hmm guna do the math and write it out here to see the outcome :)
 
Pi (3.142) x Radius ((70mm)140mm fan) Squared
Effectively 70x70x3.142
= 15395.8
Now x2 (because there would be x2 140mm fans) 
= 30791.6
 
Ok so now the 200mm fan:
 
Pi (3.142) x Radius ((100mm)200mm fan) Squared
Effectively 100x100x3.142
= 31420
"
 
To add, a larger fan will spin slower and be quieter than smaller fans. I have the largest fan sizes I can have in my case. 4x200mm, 2x 140mm, 2x 120mm, 1x80mm, 1x120mm. It's pretty quite and stays cool, it was  even quite when I just had the 200mm fans installed.

My Rig :  Case: Cooler Master HAF X ,Motherboard: Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H,PSU: Seasonic SS-750KM3,Processor: Core I7 4770k (overclocked 4.7ghz),Cooler: Corsair H100i, GPU: EVGA GTX 780 with acx cooler, RAM: G.Skill Ripjaws 16gb DDR3 1600 (overclocked to 2000mhz), HDDS  Samsung 840 EVO 250 gb SSD , Western digital  2tb 7200 rpm 64mb cache, Old 1tb laptop drive I had , 320gb for os backup daily, 80gb external for weekly backups,Drives 2x Lg Blu Ray burner WH16MS40,MISC: Tp-Link dual band wireless card, Logitech g510s, Razer Deathadder 2013, Acer G236HLBbd 23" monitor, Old tv I had 23" for secondary monitor, old 32" samsung tv third monitor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I'd go for more unless you can fit 180+mm fans. The difference between 140mm fans and 120mm fans is next to nothing, in some cases 140mm fans don't perform as well as 120mm fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/322958-31-smaller-fans-cooling

 

"Area a circle A = Pi times r squared

 
A 200 mm fan has 0.0314 square meters area [ believe me I did the math ]
 
a 140 mm fan has 0.015 square meters , but there are two of them so 0.030 
 
The single 200mm fan has more area [ just] than two smaller fans , and even more again when you consider that all three fans have a similar size hub sizes and you lose that area twice with the smaller fans .
 
Also if a 200 mm fan is spinning at the same speed as a 140 mm fan the tips of the blades are moving much faster . This is part of the reason why a larger fan doesnt have to spin so fast to move more air . A bonus of that is that it then makes less noise 
 
One big fan , not two small ones"
 
"Hmm guna do the math and write it out here to see the outcome :)
 
Pi (3.142) x Radius ((70mm)140mm fan) Squared
Effectively 70x70x3.142
= 15395.8
Now x2 (because there would be x2 140mm fans) 
= 30791.6
 
Ok so now the 200mm fan:
 
Pi (3.142) x Radius ((100mm)200mm fan) Squared
Effectively 100x100x3.142
= 31420
"
 
To add, a larger fan will spin slower and be quieter than smaller fans.

 

 So lets say if you have a 230mm fan at 100% and a 140mm at 100% the 230mm fan will have the more airflow... correct? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

So lets say if you have a 230mm fan at 100% and a 140mm at 100% the 230mm fan will have the more airflow... correct?

Theorically correct because like he said more area so to push the same amount as two 140s it would spin slower. Logically it makes since if you pushed it even more it would push more air. The only barrier to this is making sure that top rpms are the same because otherwise it won't be exactly what you think. Ie smaller fans spin faster and have a higher top speed while larger fans spin slower and have a lower top speed and then you'll never be able to compared them because at 100% they won't be spinning the same speed.

I'm a student currently attending the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, if you attend or around there please don't hesitate to contact me!

 

Mudkip: CPU: i5-4670k; Cooler: CM Hyper 212 Evo; Memory: 16GBs Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600MHz; Motherboard: Gigabyte Z97X UD5H; GPU: ASUS DCUII 770 2GB @ 1254MHz; HDD: Seagate Barracude 1TB; PSU: CX750M; Case: ThermalTake A31 Chaser Thunder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 So lets say if you have a 230mm fan at 100% and a 140mm at 100% the 230mm fan will have the more airflow... correct? 

As @Cheese4395 said,if they are the spinning at the same rpms then yes the 230mm will push more air. Now keep in mind larger fans typically have lower rpms than smaller fans, meaning while the larger fan has potential to push more air, it may not. But that's entirely dependant on the manufactures speed rating and what they feel is adequate. But on the same side of the coin the larger fan will push the same air at a lower rpm compared to a 140mm at a higher rpm. Difference being the larger will be quieter at the same rpm. If the smaller fan has more rpms then it will push more air, but only because it can spin faster not because it is more efficient. I take larger fans over smaller fans.

My Rig :  Case: Cooler Master HAF X ,Motherboard: Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H,PSU: Seasonic SS-750KM3,Processor: Core I7 4770k (overclocked 4.7ghz),Cooler: Corsair H100i, GPU: EVGA GTX 780 with acx cooler, RAM: G.Skill Ripjaws 16gb DDR3 1600 (overclocked to 2000mhz), HDDS  Samsung 840 EVO 250 gb SSD , Western digital  2tb 7200 rpm 64mb cache, Old 1tb laptop drive I had , 320gb for os backup daily, 80gb external for weekly backups,Drives 2x Lg Blu Ray burner WH16MS40,MISC: Tp-Link dual band wireless card, Logitech g510s, Razer Deathadder 2013, Acer G236HLBbd 23" monitor, Old tv I had 23" for secondary monitor, old 32" samsung tv third monitor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×