Jump to content

Is 2560x1440 the new 1650x1080?

SuperfastJellyfish

what is 1650x1080 :P

"Unofficially Official" Leading Scientific Research and Development Officer of the Official Star Citizen LTT Conglomerate | Reaper Squad, Idris Captain | 1x Aurora LN


Game developer, AI researcher, Developing the UOLTT mobile apps


G SIX [My Mac Pro G5 CaseMod Thread]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean 1920x1080?

 

its 1680 x 1050 (which I have not used in like a million years)

 

But yes most high end gpus can fluently play games at 1440p at max settings!

Desktop - Corsair 300r i7 4770k H100i MSI 780ti 16GB Vengeance Pro 2400mhz Crucial MX100 512gb Samsung Evo 250gb 2 TB WD Green, AOC Q2770PQU 1440p 27" monitor Laptop Clevo W110er - 11.6" 768p, i5 3230m, 650m GT 2gb, OCZ vertex 4 256gb,  4gb ram, Server: Fractal Define Mini, MSI Z78-G43, Intel G3220, 8GB Corsair Vengeance, 4x 3tb WD Reds in Raid 10, Phone Oppo Reno 10x 256gb , Camera Sony A7iii

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

they where /are both stepping stones for the real res coming after them, FHD and UHD

ITX Monster: CPU: I5 4690K GPU: MSI 970 4G Mobo: Asus Formula VI Impact RAM: Kingston 8 GB 1600MHz PSU: Corsair RM 650 SSD: Crucial MX100 512 GB HDD: laptop drive 1TB Keyboard: logitech G710+ Mouse: Steelseries Rival Monitor: LG IPS 23" Case: Corsair 250D Cooling: H100i

Mobile: Phone: Broken HTC One (M7) Totaly Broken OnePlus ONE Samsung S6 32GB  :wub:  Tablet: Google Nexus 7 2013 edition
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's 1680 x 1050. My monitor uses that.

 

I think you're talking about 1920 x 1080 though.

i5 4670k @ 4.2GHz (Coolermaster Hyper 212 Evo); ASrock Z87 EXTREME4; 8GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3 RAM @ 2133MHz; Asus DirectCU GTX 560; Super Flower Golden King 550 Platinum PSU;1TB Seagate Barracuda;Corsair 200r case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

what is 1650x1080 :P

 

My monitor...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

My monitor...

no its not.

"Unofficially Official" Leading Scientific Research and Development Officer of the Official Star Citizen LTT Conglomerate | Reaper Squad, Idris Captain | 1x Aurora LN


Game developer, AI researcher, Developing the UOLTT mobile apps


G SIX [My Mac Pro G5 CaseMod Thread]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, 2560x1600 will become the new 1680x1050 as those are both most commonly 16:10 aspect ratio.

2560x1440 will become the new 1920x1080 because those are most commonly 16:9 aspect ratio.

 

It's funny how there are more pixels on the 1600p model but pretty much all the displays with that res for a desktop come in a 30'' and as a result the actual pixel density is a tiny lower than that of a 27'' 1440p monitor. (maybe 8ppi)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

no its not.

 

So your monitor has an aspect ratio of 55:36?

 

Oh I didn't read good :P, thought it said "1680X1050" instead of "1650X1080"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I didn't read good :P, thought it said "1680X150" instead of "1650X1080"

That's one messed up monitor if it's only 150 px high :P

Aragorn (WS): 250D | 6800k | 840 Pro 512GB | Intel 530 480GB  | Asus X99-M WS | 64GB DDR4 | Corsair HX720i | GTX 1070 | Corsair H115i | Philips BDM4350UC 43" 3840x2160 IPS

Gimli (server):  Node 304 | G4560 | ADATA XPG SX8000 128GB | 2x 5TB WD Red | ASROCK H270M-ITX/AC  | 8GB DDR4 | Seasonic 400FL

 Omega (server):                 Fractal Arc Mini R2 | i3 4130 | 500GB Maxtor | 2TB WD Red : Raid 1 | 3TB Seagate Barracuda | 16GB RAM | Seasonic G-450w
Alpha (WS): 900D | 4770k | GTX 780  | 840 Pro 512GB  | GA-Z87X-OC | Corsair RM 850 | 24GB 2400mhz | Samsung S27B970D 2560x1440

                              ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's one messed up monitor if it's only 150 px high :P

 

aargh typo :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It`s more like the new 720p. 

 

1440p is to 2160p what was (and still is) 720p to 1080p.

 

They all have the same 16:9 aspect ratio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, 2560x1600 will become the new 1680x1050 as those are both most commonly 16:10 aspect ratio.

2560x1440 will become the new 1920x1080 because those are most commonly 16:9 aspect ratio.

 

It's funny how there are more pixels on the 1600p model but pretty much all the displays with that res for a desktop come in a 30'' and as a result the actual pixel density is a tiny lower than that of a 27'' 1440p monitor. (maybe 8ppi)

 

I was more referring to how 1440p is kind of the awkward resolution in between 1080 and 4K - much like 1680x1050 was the awkward res between 720p and 1080p.

 

 

It's 1680 x 1050. My monitor uses that.

 

I think you're talking about 1920 x 1080 though.

 

Typo, I meant 1680x1050, my bad. I definitely Don't mean 1080, see above^

It`s more like the new 720p. 

 

1440p is to 2160p what was (and still is) 720p to 1080p.

 

They all have the same 16:9 aspect ratio.

I'm referring more to the number regions rather than aspect ratio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I was more referring to how 1440p is kind of the awkward resolution in between 1080 and 4K - much like 1680x1050 was the awkward res between 720p and 1080p.

 

 

 

Typo, I meant 1680x1050, my bad. I definitely Don't mean 1080, see above^

I'm referring more to the number regions rather than aspect ratio.

 

But it`s not :)

 

1680x1050 was not between 720p and 1080p as they are not the same aspect ratio, 1600x900 was between 720p and 1080p.

 

the most common 16:10 resolutions:

 

1280x800, 1440×900, 1680×1050, 1920×1200, 2560×1600

 

 

the most common 16:9 resolutions:

 

1280x720, 1366×768, 1600×900, 1920×1080, 2560×1440, 3840×2160

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

But it`s not :)

1680x1050 was not between 720p and 1080p as they are not the same aspect ratio, 1600x900 was between 720p and 1080p.

the most common 16:10 resolutions:

1280x800, 1440×900, 1680×1050, 1920×1200, 2560×1600

the most common 16:9 resolutions:

1280x720, 1366×768, 1600×900, 1920×1080, 2560×1440, 3840×2160

You're totally missing my point. Oh well :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I`m not, as i wrote earlier 1440p is the new 720p it`s exactly four times bigger, as is 4K to 1080p.

 

The "awkward" one betwwen 1080p and 4K your looking for would be 3360x2100.

 

I don't see any awkwardness with 1440p it`s exactly double the width and double the height of 720p.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think 1600x900 is the what you're referring to.  The "inbetween" resolution between 720p and 1080p that no one ever designs any content for.  Yes, I think 2560x1440 will become that.  It's a resolution that's really only used in the computer world, and not in home theater, much like 1600x900.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean 1920x1080?

its 1680 x 1050 (which I have not used in like a million years)

But yes most high end gpus can fluently play games at 1440p at max settings!

Correction - most multiple GPU set ups can fluently play game a 1440p at max settings.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correction - most multiple GPU set ups can fluently play game a 1440p at max settings.

 

How is that a correction? :) I said "high end gpus" not single gpu

 

for example sli 760s I would consider quite high end

Desktop - Corsair 300r i7 4770k H100i MSI 780ti 16GB Vengeance Pro 2400mhz Crucial MX100 512gb Samsung Evo 250gb 2 TB WD Green, AOC Q2770PQU 1440p 27" monitor Laptop Clevo W110er - 11.6" 768p, i5 3230m, 650m GT 2gb, OCZ vertex 4 256gb,  4gb ram, Server: Fractal Define Mini, MSI Z78-G43, Intel G3220, 8GB Corsair Vengeance, 4x 3tb WD Reds in Raid 10, Phone Oppo Reno 10x 256gb , Camera Sony A7iii

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it will be when 4k is the new "1080p norm"

 

2560x1440 and 2560x1600 will be the weird resolutions before 4k

Linux "nerd".  If I helped you please like my post and maybe add me as a friend :)  ^_^!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correction - most multiple GPU set ups can fluently play game a 1440p at max settings.

 

Technically, most games right now should run no problem on 1440p max on the top of the line cards (295x2 as an example). If anything, AMD and Nvidia need to start offring cards that can power 1440p at high or max at the price range of the 770/280x. Hopefully with the GTX 800 series and the R9-300 series.

We all need a daily check-up from the neck up to avoid stinkin' thinkin' which ultimately leads to the hardening of attitudes. - Zig Ziglar

The sad fact about atheists is that they stand for nothing while standing against things that have brought much good to the world. Now ain't that sad. - Anonymous

Replace fear with faith and fear will disappear. - Billy Cox  ......................................Also, Legalism, Education-bred Arrogance and Hubris-based Assumption are BULLSHIT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×